User talk:Cardinalhijack

June 2026

Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. MrOllie (talk) 20:33, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for the message. I dont know why you are so hell bent on forming vendettas against certain edits and constantly undoing them, as it shows on your own User page with other people complaining about you doing this.

For the second time, can you please explain in plain english:

1. Why you are deciding the site is a spam link, as per your edit description? The site perfectly explains both the topics on the wikipedia pages the edits were added to (minecraft multiplayer and minecraft modding)

2. Why you are deciding the site is not a reliable source when:

a. If you take time to read the site, it explains the topic perfectly

b. Links on the articles in question have literally 404 error sites as their references, why are you leaving those in?

Yes, thank you again for explaining about the nofollow tag. I dont own or manage the site, but this is more evidence that the edits arn't there for the sites search ranking and simply there because they provide value.

Could you please explain the above or I will be requesting arbitration. I will also provide the evidence on your own user page that you have been doing the same to my edits to other peoples genuinely positive edits. Cardinalhijack (talk) 21:32, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

You should go ahead and request arbitration, because I am not motivated by threats from people trying to force in links to their favorite website. MrOllie (talk) 23:40, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

MrOllie, the only person who has been threatening people, is you. Simply googling your name yields thousands of people complaining about your behaviour - people with genuine experience and produced scholarly articles in a topic having their edits removed by you/your team.

You STILL have not told me why my source was spam. You STILL have not told me why my source is "unreliable" while other text which have citations in LITERALLY link to 404 error pages. Your editing behaviour clearly has nothing to do with the citation and everything to do with your own agenda - as countless others online are saying.

The purpose of wikipedia is to be editable and contributed to by all - not a team of people acting as god to decide what stays and what doesn't on arbitrary reasoning. You're damaging the site as many others are saying. Cardinalhijack (talk) 09:01, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

You don't get to play the victim - I'm not going to play the mentor and answer your questions while you make empty threats and insults at the same time. MrOllie (talk) 12:27, 27 June 2026 (UTC)