Carlosyrastorza

hey. This is regarding freelancer wiki page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freelancer.com . it appears that the changes you were making were deleted later by freelancer marketing team (in regard to fraud reports).

I've introduced similar info, before reviewing the changes and finding your edits. The info regarding freelancer's fraudulent behavior was always removed by an anonymous user.

We need to watch this page to make sure that they don't remove it again. To watch the page add it to your watch list.

December 2012

Hello, I'm Seaphoto. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Freelancer.com without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Seaphoto^Talk 04:51, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Freelancer with this edit. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate may links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Seaphoto^Talk 04:52, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Freelancer.com with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 05:24, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

ODesk

You need to find a reliable source. One that is not a blog, forum, or social media. Anybody can publish a website and forums and social media sites are filled with all sorts of stories. Isn't there an expose by CNN, NBC, CBS, Time, BBC, etc.? Please don't put up content like that unless you have a RS. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 09:36, 20 December 2012 (UTC)