Edit war at Derek Ogilvie

edit

Message for 109.121.95.175 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) / Carpardar (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log):

That source is already used and your wording violates NPOV because it lacks attribution. The information is already present, with attribution. Cold reading is already mentioned. You are also violating WP:3RR so stop. -- Brangifer (talk) 17:40, 17 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Please cease adding this material to the Derek Ogilve article. It is not sourced, because you did not explicitly name your source in the form of an inline citation, as required by WP:Verifiability, WP:No Original Research and WP:Identifying Reliable Sources, and because the material clearly reflects your personal point of view, which is prohibited by WP:Neutrality. If you can cite a reliable, published source for this material, you can learn how to make inline citations here. In addition, please make sure to write your material in the formal tone expected of en encyclopedia. The passage "Weather he is doing this deliberately or not is not proved beyond reasonable doubt, he might be fooling himself...", for example, is a run-on sentence. If you have any other questions about editing, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 22:59, 17 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

December 2010

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for abusing multiple accounts. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 17:36, 19 December 2010 (UTC)Reply