Casull
I will use the {{talkback}} template to communicate with you.
Ok
editI will stop the removing the images from that page.--Librarianpmolib (talk) 10:59, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Spectral Souls
editHi, I read your question on the talk of Spectral Souls. Unfortunately the solution is that I had to delete the article because, as you discovered, it was a copyright violation. Thank you for noticing. Also, I left the welcome tag here, everyone deserves a boilerplate welcome". :) Garion96 (talk) 21:12, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
The last edit I went to is probably the best one to use. The edit you reverted to still has vandalism. HalfShadow (talk) 03:21, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
- Don't worry about it. It took me three times and about that many minutes to find a 'clean' edit. HalfShadow (talk) 03:23, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
WWE No Way Out
editWhat was up with that edit summary? You shouldn't be surprised no one caught it. You caught it only 13 minutes after it happened, plus it happened at 4:40AM EST (meaning most people in North America were sleeping). TJ Spyke 12:33, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
February 2008
editHello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Tubeway Army: You may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. JD554 (talk) 21:48, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Pidgeon
editI think pidgeon makes more sense to be the pidgeon I said rather than pigeon because pidgeon ain't pigeon man. You hear?—Preceding unsigned comment added by AlioTheFool (talk • contribs) 01:13, Feb 27, 2008
pigeons shit on windshields
pidgeons shit on messageboards
—Preceding unsigned comment added by AlioTheFool (talk • contribs) 01:14, Feb 27, 2008
inuse tag
editHi, please try not to edit articles marked with inuse tag. I was working on Kagaya Yutaka as you edited it. This way we can make sure we don't run into edit conflicts. Thanks! --Ubardak (talk) 09:06, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
- Response copied from (Ubardak: talk):Sorry about that. I normally respect inuse tags, but this time something gripped me and guided my hand towards fixing up the Japanese linking. It won't happen again, most likely. Casull (talk) 09:09, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Re: vandal
editNo problem. Evil saltine (talk) 09:30, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
oh, I know!
editThey just keep piling on the vandalism. I guess this happens from time to time but I'd never seen it like this before. I reported one of them on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism so hopefully the page will get protected or something. Thanks for the note! :) --JaGa (talk) 09:45, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
wha?
edit?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.48.218.18 (talk) 09:54, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
actually
editActually, what I put in was the following.
2008 Possible Biological Outbreak?
On the Sunday of March 2, 2008, at approx. 11 PM, authorities in the Philipsburg region began to receive panicked phone calls describing violent attacks stemming from the town's homeless. While at first these were dismissed as standard calls, within hours police began to notice a common thread: all the victims had been bitten by their assailants.
Once restrained, the attackers were taken to Providence General Hospital, and studied for a common vector to explain the abruptly violent nature of the homeless population. Possible ingestion of narcotics was ruled out early on, and now doctors are suspecting a biological factor.
This section is referring to current events, and thus needs additional updates when available.
Which is currently true. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.140.186.229 (talk) 09:58, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
Rollback
editHello, I have granted your request for rollback per your request on my talk page. Please remember that it should only be used for blatant vandalism, for edits which are not obviously vandalism a more informative edit summary should always be used. Please review the Rollback policy, the notes at Requests for rollback, and note that any admin can remove rollback rights if they have been misused. Feel free to ask me if you have any questions. Enjoy. -- zzuuzz (talk) 12:04, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
WoW Box Art
editNo, lol it was a mistake. I had 2 edit templates open and got mixed up. Check out Warhammer Online That's what I meant to do! :P Denton22 (talk) 07:01, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Signature
editMay I ask why your signature does not link to your user page? This makes it difficult to communicate with you. — Knowledge Seeker দ 07:57, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
- What the crap? I thought it did! Thanks for telling me. Casull 08:00, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
- I’m glad I mentioned it then! Thanks for fixing it so quickly! — Knowledge Seeker দ 18:56, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
editThe RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
Thanks for reverting that vandalism on my userpage. =D fixed it. Malinaccier Public (talk) 19:25, 10 March 2008 (UTC) |
A question involving warnings
editIf a user makes an edit that involves something along the lines of "there's a constellation the size of my cock" is it appropriate to give him a one and only warning before putting his IP on the admin intervention page if he goes about it again? Casull 22:43, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
- That would be appropriate as long as he does it again. Hopes this helps ~ LegoKontribsTalkM 22:53, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you very much. Vandals, here I come! Casull 06:32, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
attacking myself
editheya! i blanked my own user page, i cbf loggin in :) thanks anyway symode09's 07:31, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oh snap, my bad. Casull 07:32, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
dd
editAh-ha jokes on you buddy! I'v been using my mouse the whole time! What are you doing on the computer a 2:30 in the morning? I'm drunk. What's your excuse? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.25.21.198 (talk) 07:44, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
- It's 12:44 AM here, so it's too early to be sleeping. You're awfully coherent for someone who's drunk. Casull 07:46, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
What do you think?
editAny less brain-stabby? You're also perfectly welcome to tweak it yourself if you like (and I'm of course perfectly welcome to tweak it back if I don't like it XD) Thanks for the note, that's probably annoyed every single person who's ever visited my userpage, and you're the first person with the guts to actually say something about it. Constructive criticism is a gift, and I appreciate yours :-) Peace, delldot talk 08:27, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for being very cheerful about this. I've done what you suggested and changed a bit of the page, though I think blue and purple still blend with the show links a bit too much. Casull 08:40, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
- Cool! Thanks. No one's ever edited my userpage productively before! Hm, yeah, I never thought of the colors blending with the show links before. Maybe I'll work on it later, but actually I'll probably see something shiny and forget about it XD If you ever want to do more tweaks, go right ahead. delldot talk 08:45, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
editfor this revert! Wonder how I pissed off the IP! TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 04:09, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
- No problem. I was surprised as you were. Thanks for taking the time to come here. Casull 05:35, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
- I like to thank those on vandalism patrol, I think it makes Wiki a nicer place overall when people don't come across random pointless violence. Funny thing is usually I can tell at least what article the IP is annoyed with, but not in this case. Have a nice day! TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 14:07, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Happy First Day of Spring!
editJust wishing you a wonderful First Day of Spring {{subst:CURRENTYEAR}}! ~~~~
To spread this message to others, add {{subst:First Day Of Spring}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Re Indef Blocked
editThanks for the joke, but as you can see here, I did a similar joke today. And, I thought the "new message" was some sort of complaint/question. I'm not a grump. Hust a little busy :) But, thanks :D Steve Crossin (talk to me) 08:10, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Re Block
editBlocked ? Me ? A serious editor who never wanders on the vicinity of Father Ted, Dark Side of the Rainbow, Headbanging and the like ? There MUST be a mistake, honestly...
Seriously, thank you for the smile, I nearly forgot it was April Fool's Day :D Have a nice day, Rosenknospe (talk) 08:35, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
A wikipage in need
editWhat you did is funny! Anyway.. Wikipedia is strictly buisness ( mostly), so here goes... Talk:Floppy disk It is actually a long story. look all the way at the end of this talk page with my username for details because I am wondering about it. 5 things formerly on this list have been solved so spread the word!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)