Caultn

Welcome!

Hello, Caultn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Suzuki GSX-R750RK have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome.  Dennis Bratland (talk) 18:41, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Caultn, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Caultn! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:03, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

September 2017

Hello, I'm Bennv3771. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Esther Ku seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Bennv3771 (talk) 10:14, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Bennv3771. I noticed that you recently removed content from Esther Ku without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Bennv3771 (talk) 10:16, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Esther Ku. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Bennv3771 (talk) 01:28, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Please discuss your edits on Talk:Esther Ku before re-adding them. Bennv3771 (talk) 02:04, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Also, if you are [IP 67.10.167.124], please note that you shouldn't be evading your block. Bennv3771 (talk) 04:54, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

That is not me. Relax with the accusations. Caultn (talk) 05:35, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

@Caultn: Ok that's good to know. My bad then. I was checking because both you and the IP repeatedly tried to add the exact same sentence into the article: "Ku's career has garnered mixed to negative reception". Bennv3771 (talk) 06:08, 3 September 2017 (UTC)