February 2011

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Limba noastră. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive; until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

If you feel your major overhaul of this page is significantly better than what was there before, please explain this on the article's talk page. Getting into an edit war, and accusing other editors of vandalizing the site when they undo your work (but without explaining yourself or making any effort at all to reach a consensus with others) is not the way things are customarily done on Wikipedia. Richwales (talk · contribs) 07:11, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Du gamla, Du fria, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you! -- Arthena(talk) 11:32, 8 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Unblock

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Caycedo736 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm not sock puppet to Achun1111y. Please unblock me.

Decline reason:

You are blocked for vandalism, not for sockpuppetry. I see no reference on your page to the user whom you mention; perhaps you would like to explain why you feel that you need to defend yourself against a sockpuppetry accusation? --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 09:18, 6 April 2011 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.