Cgbuff

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Cgbuff, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 03:20, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Please learn how to edit

You embedded raw urls into references by using {{URL}} instead of leaving a reference. The tools used to expand references can't work on those so please don't do it again. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:43, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

It's quite unclear to me what you're trying to say, so I'll have to guess. I did not add {{URL}} anywhere. I merely moved existing such references.

2022 Russian mystery deaths moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2022 Russian mystery deaths, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ASUKITE 13:21, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2022 Russian mystery deaths has been accepted

2022 Russian mystery deaths, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ASUKITE 15:13, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about 2022 Russian mystery deaths

Hello, Cgbuff, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Jon698, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, 2022 Russian mystery deaths, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2022 Russian mystery deaths.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Jon698}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Jon698 (talk) 05:09, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Slab (geometry) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Slab (geometry) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slab (geometry) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Elmidae (talk · contribs) 07:03, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Interview request

Hey cgbuff! I'm writing for Slate (magazine) about Wikipedia's coverage of topics that may relate to rumors or conspiracies. I'd love to interview you about your work on 2022 Russian businessmen mystery deaths. I don't want to give personal contact info here, but you can contact me on Twitter as anniierau or most other social media as annierau. Thanks! Annierau (talk) 18:24, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve List of Swiss watch manufacturers

Hello, Cgbuff,

Thank you for creating List of Swiss watch manufacturers.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This page needs references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|FormalDude}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

––FormalDude (talk) 04:27, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jack (geometry)

The article Jack (geometry) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This appears to be a random collection of references that have separately used the title term inconsistently to refer to different shapes, with no depth of content beyond nomenclature. It is more about the name than any one shape, violating WP:NOTDICT. There is no evidence that there is a significant body of geometric research on a single specific shape with this name.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:44, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Jack (geometry) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jack (geometry) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack (geometry) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—David Eppstein (talk) 23:37, 8 April 2024 (UTC)