Blocked for sockpuppetry

edit
 

The article Dubbo International Body Building Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

promotional article failing WP:CORPDEPTH

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Logical Cowboy (talk) 13:10, 6 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Blocked

edit

Speedy deletion nomination of Anton Tagliaferro

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Anton Tagliaferro, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

— this puff piece was created by indef-blocked sockpuppeteer User:Chaklalajob. Such articles are forbidden per WP:NOTFORPROMOTION; therefore, please delete per WP:G11

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. —Unforgettableid (talk) 02:42, 20 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Lloyd Bancaire

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Lloyd Bancaire, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

— this puff piece was created by indef-blocked sockpuppeteer User:Chaklalajob. I have seen convincing proof that Chaklalajob is a paid editor; if you would like to see this proof, drop a note on my talk page. Puff pieces are forbidden per WP:NOTFORPROMOTION; therefore, please delete per WP:G11

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. —Unforgettableid (talk) 03:14, 20 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Anton Tagliaferro for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anton Tagliaferro is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anton Tagliaferro until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Unforgettableid (talk) 19:35, 4 March 2014 (UTC)Reply