Tilly4ChampionPetfoods

August 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, club, organization, company, or website, I have blocked this account from editing. You are welcome to continue editing after you have chosen a new username that complies with Wikipedia's username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable, regardless of the username that you choose. Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid or compensated in any way, you must disclose who is paying you to edit here.

Please take a moment to either create a new account, or request a username change of your current account here. The new username that you choose must represent you as an individual person, and it must comply with Wikipedia's username policy.

• To create a new account with a different username, simply log out of this account and then click here to make a new one.
• If you prefer to change the username on this account, you may do so by adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page (this page): {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken or in use by another account. You can go here to search and see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is available to be taken.

Please also note that you are permitted to use a username that contains the name of a company or organization if it also identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".

Appeals: If your username does not represent a group, organization, website, or other entity described above, and if you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 

Thank you.

Cullen328 (talk) 21:12, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Tilly4ChampionPetfoods (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

Tilly4ChampionPetfoods (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Added my name, along with the company I represent. ChampionPetfoods (talk) 10:06, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Accept reason:

I am removing the block, you will need to make the paid disclosure fairly soon. 331dot (talk) 09:56, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

I've fixed the placement and format of your request(the template must be copied and placed outside the notice before you fill it in). Would you commit to reading conflict of interest and paid editing? I'm just looking for a commitment, you may actually do it once renamed. 331dot (talk) 12:50, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

I have read the conflict of interests guidelines. I do not plan on making any edits myself, just suggesting them with acknowledgment to my conflict on interests. I would appreciate it if you could please help me unblock my user. Tilly4ChampionPetfoods (talk) 08:52, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Suggested text from the FDA report

Quoting large amounts of text is always the best strategy when it comes to government reports. Governments use very wordy language, so it behooves you to include as much of it as possible to eliminate ambiguity. Since nothing the government produces can be copyrighted, you can cut and paste as much as you like. When it comes to one government report, the FDA report from 2022 that you've mentioned in a lot of your recent edit requests, your best bet is to follow this strategy. Here is my example proposed text for articles covering this topic In 2022, the FDA released a follow up report which superceded the 2019 research. The follow-up report stated the following:

Most of the diets associated with the reports of non-hereditary DCM have legume seed ingredients, also called "pulses" (e.g., peas, lentils, etc.), high in their ingredient lists ... these include both "grain-free" and grain-containing formulations. Legumes, including pulse ingredients, have been used in pet foods for many years, with no evidence to indicate they are inherently dangerous, but analysis of data reported to the Center for Veterinary Medicine indicates that pulse ingredients are used in many "grain-free" diets in greater proportion than in most grain-containing formulas. FDA has asked pet food manufacturers to provide diet formulations so we can further understand the proportions of ingredients in commercially-available diets and possible relationships with non-hereditary DCM. The FDA does not know the specific connection between these diets and cases of non-hereditary DCM and is continuing to explore the role of genetics, underlying medical conditions, and/or other factors.

As you can see, the most salient points from that FDA report are included in the text that I've quoted. If you look closely, you will also see the text that you proposed The FDA does not know the specific connection between these diets and cases of non-hereditary DCM I placed that text amongst the quoted text that I chose. If your text had been placed by itself, It would have communicated very little to the reader. Ambiguously short statements, when placed on their own, become opaque and reveal little substantial information. Your proposed text highlighted what was for the FDA a negative — that they did not know the specific connection. Mentioning this by itself could easily lead a reader to believe the following:

Well, that's the end of the story. If the FDA does not know the specific connection, then they'll probably never know, or there wasn't a connection to even begin with"

If a reader comes away with that assumption, then they've really missed the boat, and what a disservice we would be doing to them if they did. You and I both know that the FDA report says much more, and goes out of its way to state how additional information needs to be provided by pet food manufacturers and collected to fill in gaps. Look how the quoted text that you chose earlier now flourishes after I placed it along with its brother and sister sentences from the report. I'm hoping you'll keep this in mind for future edit requests on this particular topic. Regards,  Spintendo  12:42, 23 October 2023 (UTC)