Chandan1980

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chukkimane (August 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chukkimane and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Chukkimane, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 09:07, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Chandan1980! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 09:07, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Vanishing Kodavas (November 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Vanishing Kodavas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Vanishing Kodavas, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 05:12, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Vanishing Kodavas (December 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by K.e.coffman were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Vanishing Kodavas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Vanishing Kodavas, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

K.e.coffman (talk) 01:10, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Notes

I've got a few notes for you and Mikesteve10 - I don't know if the two of you are editing together or not, but I assume that you are.

I've made some edits to the page, specifically to the introduction/lead section. I've moved the review to its own section and I've also edited the lead to remove some of the more extensive mention of the Kodavas. The reason I did this was because the sourcing wasn't specifically about this book, which is ultimately what you need here. Also, this material is redundant to what's already in the article about the Kodavas - people who want more information can click through to the main article, making it unnecessary to give huge amounts of detail in the article.

The synopsis section needs to be re-written. There are a lot of non-neutral passages in there that come across as your personal perspective on things. Anything that could be seen as an opinion needs to either be attributed to the book's author clearly (such as "according to.." "described by the author as...") or they need to be removed because ultimately perspectives and opinions are subjective to the reader. While one person may see something as 'fascinating', the next person may not.

With sourcing, I would pretty much stick to things that specifically cover the book. Sources that don't cover the book can't show where the book is notable. If you're using them to back up things that the author wrote in the book, it's better to use the book itself as a source. It still wouldn't be able to give notability, but readers would be able to verify that the author included this in her work. The issue with using sources that don't cover the book is that we can't guarantee that the author made these specific points in the book or made them clearly, which would make the use of such sources potentially original research. Being used in the synopsis section implies that these are things that are covered in the book.

I hope that this helps. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 20:05, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Chukkimane

Hello, Chandan1980. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chukkimane".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. DannyS712 (talk) 08:31, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The Vanishing Kodavas

Hello, Chandan1980. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Vanishing Kodavas".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HawkAussie (talk) 02:18, 5 August 2019 (UTC)