ChangCamille155

Welcome!

Hello, ChangCamille155, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Best practices for editors with close associations
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style
• The Teahouse, our help forum for new editors

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, visit the Teahouse, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:07, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello Jimfbleak,

From the menu option I wasn't sure if I had a COI but reading the reference you sent me I don't have a COI

I'm a physical therapist, hence I know the profession very well but I'm not a member of CAMPT, but I do work with them sometimes.

How do I know if my draft has been deleted or not ?

If it's still pending can you proof read it for me ?

ChangCamille155 (talk) 18:13, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello Jimfbleak,

I've asked 2 persons on the list you suggested me , but i none gave me answer, should I try with a 3rd and 4th ? Or is there another way ? Can you do it ?

best,

ChangCamille155 (talk) 00:56, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

More

Thank you for resonding with regard to my conflict of interest query, please read the guidance below regarding wring about an organisation.

• you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company or organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
• The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:

1. significant coverage in
2. independent,
3. multiple,
4. reliable,
5. secondary sources.

Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability.

• • It's all about what the organisation does, little about the organisation, not even a location. To show notability you need hard verifiable facts such as the number of members, number of employees, management structure, funding or expenditure.
• You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
• There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
• You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Your text was almost totally unsourced apart from two "references" to the organisation itself, it had no real facts apart from "this is what we do", and had a promotional tone and in-text external links.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. If you still wish to proceed, having read the guidance above, let me know and I'll sandbox the text Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:13, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Yes I would like to proceed and improve the notability of the article to meet the guidelines.

Please sandbox the text

ChangCamille155 (talk) 00:54, 31 May 2024 (UTC)