CharOster

CharOster, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi CharOster! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stratford Caldecott (April 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stratford Caldecott and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 22:58, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Caldecott

I should be pleased to assist to the extent that I may. In the interim, I have added a notice to the WikiProject Middle-earth Talk page, in the event that others there may be familiar with his work. Mannanan51 (talk) 18:35, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

I think there are enough citations now to establish notability. (Many of them were there already, but in an inline format, which I'm given to understand is generally discouraged.) Of the nine articles listed as mentioning Caldecott, the ones that have a significant bearing could be listed under the See Also section, but you probably would not want to overdo this. (An example would perhaps be the Hail Queen of Heaven, the Ocean Star article which quotes Caldecott, and ties to his essay "The Lord & Lady of the Rings".) Once the article is accepted, then it would be a good idea to go to the listed mentions and wikilink to the article, so its not tagged as an "orphan". I would suggest re-captioning the Bibliography as Works, as a bibliography is often a list of writings "about" a person rather than "by" them. (-compare the page on Chesterton.)

I re-arranged a good deal of what you posted, but believe I kept almost all of it. I think his studies in Tolkien are important because (1) it demonstrates his interest in the nexus between faith and culture, and (2) it broadens interest beyond the circle of Catholic intellectuals. (It is in fact where I first came upon him.) Thank you for the article. Mannanan51 (talk) 19:12, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stratford Caldecott has been accepted

Stratford Caldecott, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 15:45, 28 April 2017 (UTC)