Charles Chai

July 2024

Hi Charles Chai! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Cyclic number several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Cyclic number, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Please read the whole paragraph including the numbers you're changing to understand why the leading 0s must be included.. JBL (talk) 00:08, 8 July 2024 (UTC)