Charlesdavybrown
Please leave me comments with your signature , Thank you Charlesdavybrown (talk) 23:30, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
PSYCH 2410A peer review
edit1/1 The student has improved the quality of the information available in this article 1/1 The student has improved the clarity and/or organization of the content .5/1 The student has clearly explained the method and findings of an empirical paper 1/1 The student has correctly cited the empirical paper according to Wikipedia guidelines, and the paper is appropriate (i.e., it is an empirical study on development published the results in an academic journal)
I really enjoyed reading your contributions to this article. I thought you clarified some parts of the article up really well and the studies you cited were interesting, however I felt that you listed the findings without actually discussing the methodology and how the findings were found. Mnettle (talk) 01:41, 8 November 2012 (UTC)