User talk:Charlesdrakew/Archives/2015/November
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Charlesdrakew. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Tecodryer
Please could you look at Grain drying, User:Tecodryer, Зерносушилка and the image that was used that I removed from Grain drying that I think might not be suitable for commons? I do not have the skills to deal with this. SovalValtos (talk) 11:30, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry. We have been busy exploring the Lake District. Awesome scenery.Charles (talk) 19:56, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Semi-Protection for Amos Yee
In addition, I will be telling that we are going to have Semi Protection for Amos Yee to prevent from vandalism. This is to cause him not to get upset.
Please use Semi-Protection instead of Full Protection so easier for User accounts to update.
Unsigned comment by 119.74.47.12 at 20:25, 15 October 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.74.47.12 (talk)
Full Protection of Singapore Politicans
We are going to have the full protection for Lee Kuan Yew, Lee Hsien Loong, S.R. Nathan, Halimah Yacob and Tony Tan which they are the Singapore Politicans to protected from vandalism.
They will be using in Full Protection instead of Semi Protection to prevent from Vandalized which causes their politicans from upsetting when they edit anything on them.
We are calling for Dayton12345 (Talk) and charlesdrakew (Talk) to be protected.
Unsigned comment by 119.74.47.12 at 14:44, 16 October 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.74.47.12 (talk)
Requested move
Hi, I've started a discussion at Talk:Westfield Derby about moving articles to "Intu" X and I'm only notifying you as you participated in a previous move,
BTW sorry if you got a ping earlier - Something went wrong so figured I'd just post this to everyone instead, Fun times! 
,
Anyway thanks, –Davey2010Talk 23:26, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Consensus
Please could you give your opinion on what is the consensus in the article talk List of bus routes in London concerning a 'source'. SovalValtos (talk) 14:41, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- I am not sure you can have a consensus when only three editors are involved. Nothing has been written which makes any case for keeping the source. Local consensus means nothing anyway if it does not correspond with wider policies and guidelines. Removing LOTS as a source is justifiable under wider policy on reliable sources.Charles (talk) 10:27, 14 November 2015 (UTC)