December 2013
editWelcome!
|
It appears that not everyone believes in Einstein's special relativity, yet are entitled to their own opinions, but not to their own scientific facts. Bearian (talk) 20:25, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
<ChasGrav> To be sure, and since the science is objective and unimpeachable that the cellphone calls in question either (1) did not occur; or (2) were events of super-natural character, because it is well-attested that it is as impossible for such transmissions to have occurred as for men to fly, unaided, for Wikipedia to be censoring scientific testing and expert opinion only invalidates any credibility it may have (in the era of 'wiki-ality').~~ChasGrav~~
January 2021
editPlease do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Black Lives Matter. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Generalrelative (talk) 16:53, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
DS Alert
editThis is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.