CherryBlossomsInTheNight
Welcome!
editHello, CherryBlossomsInTheNight, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! . --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 17:55, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
But
editYou must not keep reverting changes that you don't like. If you revert more than three times in 24 hours, your right it edit will be suspended. Please use the article talk page to discuss the changes you want made, per wp:BRD. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 17:55, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Yin Yang fish from China
editHere [1] is a Chinese source that shows an identical Chinese dish. --Yel D'ohan (talk) 18:11, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
September 2019
edit
Your recent contributions at Common Era appear to show that you are engaged in edit warring; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not override another editor's contributions. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doug Weller talk 18:20, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Origin of the domestic dog. Deleting properly cited expert WP:RELIABLE secondary sources because you WP:JUSTDONTLIKEIT is WP:VANDALISM. William Harris
talk 10:10, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello, CherryBlossomsInTheNight, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as LightFromABrightStar (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. -- Deepfriedokra 10:24, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Administrator note MorningSunBright (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) was blocked 2019-08-16T00:12:18 for disruption after edit warring on Origin of the domestic dog. As user claimed compromised, was allowed to edit as StopPrejudiceNow. This name was found to be unsuitable, so she renamed to LightFromABrightStar (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log). She resumed edit warring on Origin of the domestic dog was final warned by me. She then began editing as CherryBlossomsInTheNight (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) and edit warred yet again on (you guessed it) Origin of the domestic dog. Check user proved fruitful, and both LightFromABrightStar and CherryBlossomsInTheNight were blocked for socking. Given user's recalcitrance and willingness to violate Wikipedia policy to continue edit warring, I would recommend against unblocking.-- Deepfriedokra 21:59, 18 September 2019 (UTC)