Archive 45Archive 48Archive 49Archive 50Archive 51Archive 52Archive 55

WPTC invites

Hi, Chess, and I hope you are doing well. Please refrain from issuing invites if you are not a member of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. Your edit was done in good faith, but the editor whom you invited was just warned for CIR issues and disruptive editing. You are welcome to join WPTC, but please refrain from issuing invites unless you are a member. Thank you. Destroyer (Alternate account) 17:36, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

I'd like to add that another user whom you invited was recently blocked for CIR issues. Please don't do this again. Thanks, and have a good day. Destroyer (Alternate account) 17:38, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
@Destroyeraa: I'm sorry to hear that a person was blocked. I'm also sorry to hear someone was warned for disruptive editing. I invite new users to WikiProjects when they enjoy editing in a topic area covered by the WikiProject. It's a great way to keep new users and improve their competence level. Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 17:46, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
The blocked user whom you invited was clearly unwilling to interact with other users regarding their behavior. Usually, the users whom I invited show a willingness to interact and communicate constructively. If a CIR user wants to join the wikiproject and shows an inclination to learn and improve, there isn't a reason not to invite them. Destroyer (Alternate account) 17:56, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

17:31, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive

 

Hello Chess:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 1200 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:53, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.

Thank you for your comments in my RFA

Thanks for demonstrating willingness by opposing my RFA. It takes boldness to put one's self out there alone. FYI I think I did learn after my first process about my bad closes and why I'd closed incorrectly. While I expect to one day start helping in AFD, it's not something I would take lightly. Thanks for calling me out. BusterD (talk) 16:03, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

@BusterD: I wish you luck and hope you will be a great administrator. Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 18:47, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

15:29, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Trouted

 

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: fled

you can stop now 2603:3024:2DB:E000:6966:D710:73CE:BE3B (talk) 04:52, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 July 2021

21:09, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 45

  The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 45, May – June 2021

  • Library design improvements continue
  • New partnerships
  • 1Lib1Ref update

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:04, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXXIII, July 2021

 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:31, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Doja Cat on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

20:45, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

This Month in Education: July 2021

This Month in Education

Volume 10 • Issue 7 • July 2021


ContentsHeadlinesSubscribe


In This Issue

16:18, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Philadelphia 76ers on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:32, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

19:25, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

 

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:32, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Trouted

 

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE 139.195.186.63 (talk) 14:50, 19 August 2021 (UTC) Don't change the fact of We Are Living in Simulation dude. Let us end the simulation and dissapear forever.

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

 

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:30, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

21:57, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Glitches

Hi, Chess. What can you tell me about this problem? Do you have the toolbar enabled in source mode? What's your web browser/OS? Have you encountered anything similar in other pages? Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 21:19, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

@Whatamidoing (WMF): You probably won't be a fan of this response but I was using Google Chrome on Android at the time on the desktop site, although I didn't have the "use desktop site" option enabled in the browser. I am on Monobook as well and am using the Google default keyboard. I also have the toolbar enabled in source mode. I believe at the time the character entry felt unnaturally "slow" and unresponsive. It took a lot of time for what I was typing to show up, and it was very difficult to erase what I had written as well. When I backspaced, sometimes nothing would seem to change. I do recall that when I actually posted the reply, everything looked correct in the source editor right before I pressed "reply". As to whether I've encountered this problem elsewhere, I've had input issues when editing source before on mobile where things have felt "laggy" in the same way and my input wasn't functioning in the same way (solved by closing and reopening browser) but nothing to this extent. I couldn't tell you exactly where those input issues were or if they were just isolated to Wikipedia, nor could I say if it was just limited to the automatic replying gadget.
In terms of what I was doing at that time, I was copying and pasting URLs from YouTube music and flipping between tabs. It's also rather difficult to remember, but in this particular case I might've "solved" the issue with backspacing by cutting (w/o pasting) particular letters instead of backspacing them, albeit this was after the glitch started, so to speak. This was the only time I had used this way of dealing with the issue, so it may have contributed to the especially garbled output.
I wish I could provide more detail or that I had used a more popular platform (I'm switching to Microsoft Edge and that comment was a week ago); let me know if you want any more details or if you want me to inform someone if this happens again. Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 21:47, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
I love this response, because it will let me pretend that it's all Google's fault. (A couple of decades ago, it was always 'X blames Microsoft' and 'Microsoft blames X'; I suppose all that really changes is the names.)
Here's the thing: It really could be Google's fault. Putting all these pieces together isn't super-simple; it'd be easy for something to be slightly off with slide typing, or your phone might have had a glitch from who knows where. But it could also be our fault, and if the problem's on our end, then there are several possibilities. Looking at your contribs, I assume that you're using the 2010 WikiEditor (see mw:Editor for screenshots) for your regular editing. In the Reply tool itself, the source mode's toolbar could be disabled in Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion (Untick "Enable editing tools in source mode"). The questions I have include:
  • Does this happen in normal/article editing, or only when using the Reply tool? (I've had similar problems on my laptop occasionally, maybe a couple of times a year, usually in VisualEditor.)
  • If this happens always/primarily in the Reply tool, does turning off the source mode's toolbar stop it from happening? Having the toolbar enabled changes something about the kind of "surface" in the editing box, from a simpler one to a more advanced thing. More complexity = more opportunities for bugs.
I hope this is a rare occurrence, but whenever you see it again, even if it's months from now, please think of me. You can ping me in an edit summary, drop by my talk page, revive this thread – any method that works for you. The next time it happens, I'd like to see if we can file a bug report for the devs.
Thanks, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 05:13, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Read-only reminder

A maintenance operation will be performed on Wednesday August 25 06:00 UTC. It should only last for a few minutes.

Also during this time, operations on the CentralAuth will not be possible (GlobalRenames, changing/confirming e-mail addresses, logging into new wikis, password changes).

For more details about the operation and on all impacted services, please check on Phabricator.

A banner will be displayed 30 minutes before the operation.

Please help your community to be aware of this maintenance operation. Thank you!

20:33, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

This Month in Education: August 2021

This Month in Education

Volume 10 • Issue 8 • August 2021


ContentsHeadlinesSubscribe


In This Issue

The Bugle: Issue CLXXXIV, August 2021

 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:49, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 August 2021

15:59, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Pan Sophic on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

WikiCup 2021 September newsletter

The fourth round of the competition has finished with over 500 points being required to qualify for the final round. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants,   The Rambling Man and   Epicgenius, each scoring over 3000 points, and six contestants scoring over 1000. All but one of the finalists achieved one or more FAs during the round, the exception being   Bloom6132 who demonstrated that 61 "in the news" items produces an impressive number of points. Other contestants who made it to the final are   Gog the Mild,   Lee Vilenski,   BennyOnTheLoose,   Amakuru and   Hog Farm. However, all their points are now swept away and everyone starts afresh in the final round.

Round 4 saw the achievement of 18 featured articles and 157 good articles.   Bilorv scored for a 25-article good topic on Black Mirror but narrowly missed out on qualifying for the final round. There was enthusiasm for FARs, with 89 being performed, and there were 63 GARs and around 100 DYKs during the round. As we start round 5, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it to the final round; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. For other contestants, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

15:18, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

 

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:30, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Flag of Afghanistan on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:31, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

15:31, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter September 2021

 
 
New Page Review queue September 2021

Hello Chess,

Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.

Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.

At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.

There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.

 

Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.


To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:31, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

 

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:32, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

18:29, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:30, 22 September 2021 (UTC)