User talk:Chewings72/Archive 10

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Lydia Pintscher (WMDE) in topic Wikidata weekly summary #294
Archive 5Archive 8Archive 9Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12Archive 15

Wikidata weekly summary #286

19:19, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

19:19, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #287

Wikidata weekly summary #287 Global message delivery/Targets/Wikidata

The Signpost: 24 November 2017

Wikidata weekly summary #288

20:30, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Chewings72. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #289

17:51, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #290

17:58, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 25

  The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 25, October – November 2017

  • OAWiki & #1Lib1Ref
  • User Group update
  • Global branches update
  • Spotlight: Research libraries and Wikimedia
  • Bytes in brief

Arabic, Korean and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:57, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 December 2017

15:27, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #291

Guild of Copy Editors December 2017 News

Guild of Copy Editors December 2017 News
 

 

Hello copy editors! Welcome to the December 2017 GOCE newsletter, which contains nine months(!) of updates. The Guild has been busy and successful; your diligent efforts in 2017 has brought the backlog of articles requiring copy edit to below 1,000 articles for the first time. Thanks to all editors who have contributed their time and energy to help make this happen.

Our copy-editing drives (month-long backlog-reduction drives held in odd-numbered months) and blitzes (week-long themed editing in even-numbered months) have been very successful this year.

March drive: We set out to remove April, May, and June 2016 from our backlog and all February 2017 Requests (a total of 304 articles). By the end of the month, all but 22 of these articles were cleared. Officially, of the 28 who signed up, 22 editors recorded 257 copy edits (439,952 words). (These numbers do not always make sense when you compare them to the overall reduction in the backlog, because not all editors record every copy edit on the drive page.)

April blitz: This one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 16 through 22 April; the theme was Requests. Of the 15 who signed up, 9 editors completed 43 articles (81,822 words).

May drive: The goals were to remove July, August, and September 2016 from the backlog and to complete all March 2017 Requests (a total of 300 articles). By the end of the month, we had reduced our overall backlog to an all-time low of 1,388 articles. Of the 28 who signed up, 17 editors completed 187 articles (321,810 words).

June blitz: This one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 18 through 24 June; the theme was Requests. Of the 16 who signed up, 9 editors completed 28 copy edits (117,089 words).

2017 Coordinator elections: In June, coordinators for the second half of 2017 were elected. Jonesey95 moved back into the lead coordinator position, with Miniapolis stepping down to remain as coordinator; Tdslk and Corinne returned as coordinators, and Keira1996 rejoined after an extended absence. Thanks to all who participated!

July drive: We set out to remove August, September, October, and November 2016 from the backlog and to complete all May and June 2017 Requests (a total of 242 articles). The drive was an enormous success, and the target was nearly achieved within three weeks, so that December 2016 was added to the "old articles" list used as a goal for the drive. By the end of the month, only three articles from 2016 remained, and for the second drive in a row, the backlog was reduced to a new all-time low, this time to 1,363 articles. Of the 33 who signed up, 21 editors completed 337 articles (556,482 words).

August blitz: This one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 20 through 26 August; the theme was biographical articles tagged for copy editing for more than six months (47 articles). Of the 13 who signed up, 11 editors completed 38 copy edits (42,589 words).

September drive: The goals were to remove January, February, and March 2017 from the backlog and to complete all August 2017 Requests (a total of 338 articles). Of the 19 who signed up, 14 editors completed 121 copy edits (267,227 words).

October blitz: This one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 22 through 28 October; the theme was Requests. Of the 14 who signed up, 8 editors completed 20 articles (55,642 words).

November drive: We set out again to remove January, February, and March 2017 from the backlog and to complete all October 2017 Requests (a total of 207 articles). By the end of the month, these goals were reached and the backlog shrank to its lowest total ever, 997 articles, the first time it had fallen under one thousand (click on the graph above to see this amazing feat in graphical form). It was also the first time that the oldest copy-edit tag was less than eight months old. Of the 25 who signed up, 16 editors completed 159 articles (285,929 words).

2018 Coordinator elections: Voting is open for the election of coordinators for the first half of 2018. Please visit the election page to vote between now and December 31 at 23:59 (UTC). Thanks for participating!

Housekeeping note: We do not send a newsletter before (or after) every drive or blitz. To have a better chance of knowing when the next event will start, add the GOCE's message box to your watchlist.

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators: Jonesey95, Miniapolis, Corinne, Tdslk, and Keira1996.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:04, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #292

Dec 28 2017

Hello, I see that you have reverted my changes from "swaminaryan" page. I had made changes to the page, cause it is a misleading information and it is absolute lie.

Please let me know what I need to do prove it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swamydsp90 (talkcontribs) 04:43, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

@Swamydsp90:What you need to do is to find a reliable source that supports your view. I would also suggest that you seek some assistance with your written English when contributing to the English Wikipedia as the sentence you drafted was not written in clear English. Thanks--Chewings72 (talk) 04:51, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

@Chewings72, If you look at citation 96, which doesn't really prove what Mahatma Gandhi said is correct, and it is still listed. I'm puzzled with what kinda of sources is reliable? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swamydsp90 (talkcontribs) 05:00, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

@Swamydsp90:The article on Swaminarayan, as currently drafted, quotes Mahatma Gandhi correctly (based on the web site having correctly quoted him). Are you trying to say that Gandhi was wrong in what he said?? Or are you trying to say that Gandhi has been incorrectly quoted in the web page covered by Reference 96? If so, what information do you have to support your views and is that information from a reliable source? Chewings72 (talk) 05:41, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

@Chewings72, information I have strongly contradict with information that is published on reference 96 website. Gandhiji in his letter to Maganlal (you can also google this if you wish), dated July 25 1918, mentions that swaminaryan is spreading bhakati cult and Gandhi Ji in his letter never addressed swamianrayna as a god (bhagwan). Reference 96 has no actual evidence where they got the quote from. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swamydsp90 (talkcontribs) 06:33, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

@Swamydsp90: I am sorry but I don't understand the points you are trying to make. Can I suggest you write up your views on the talk page for Swaminarayan and see what other Wikipedia users who are familiar with this issue have to say. Chewings72 (talk) 07:44, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #293

16:19, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #294

18:45, 15 January 2018 (UTC)