Speedy deletion of Ghazi Sabir-ali

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Ghazi Sabir-ali requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - Jameson L. Tai talkcontribs 17:38, 11 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of "Kit Chapman"

edit
 

A page you created, Kit Chapman, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, organisation, or web content, but does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. - NuclearWarfare contact meMy work 20:12, 26 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

July 2009

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to RuneScape, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 21:19, 12 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re: F1 2010: Features

edit

Hi,

The problem is that this reference states that F1 2010 will be based on the 2010 season; but this ref says that the game will feature "all the teams, drivers, and tracks from the FIA 2009 Formula One season". I don't think that the ref which says the game will be based on the 2010 season can be used to say that "all the teams, drivers and tracks from the FIA 2009 Formula One season" will be in the game. So I suggest that we scrap that sentence. If you agree with me, go ahead and delete it. Indeed, we could delete the whole "features" section, as I think the ref from SimRacingWorld is getting confused about the difference between F1 2009 and F1 2010. What do you think?

And yes, I am an F1 fan - read my user page for more about me.

Thanks for bringing this up, Darth Newdar talk 07:49, 1 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

I have deleted that sentence. Darth Newdar talk 18:12, 1 September 2009 (UTC)Reply