Chighchighchigh

December 2021

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Ebrar Karakurt. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 17:12, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Do not warn me just to claim I did biased, commentary or analysis-like editions when I actually did the exact opposite of these type of editions. I made those changes just to purge it from its non-neutral point of view, which tells the story from perspectives of "she did nothing wrong" or "love is love" opinions. Expressions like "homophobic slur" only lacks objectivity, as it blames those people with bigotry and disrespect, ironically being bigot and disrespectful itself. The centuries-old teaching in Islam is anti-LGBT. It is not neutral to convey this view to the reader as if it were a "negative" opinion. Chighchighchigh (talk) 17:21, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Ebrar Karakurt. bonadea contributions talk 17:29, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Well, it is hard to do, but I will be calm. Are you blind, or idiot? If you're neither, read what I wrote just above of this comment, please. Chighchighchigh (talk) 17:30, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:İsmail Kendir per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/İsmail Kendir. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  clpo13_(talk) 17:47, 3 December 2021 (UTC)