User talk:Childzy/1

Latest comment: 17 years ago by 80.167.137.230 in topic External link, Bulls & Bears

Thanx for the Welcome

edit

I am still quite new at this but hope to get better. Still not sure about a lot of things so I guess I will play it all by ear and do lots of reading to catch up. Thalia

Evanescence article stuff to do

edit

Hey Childzy,

You and I have recently been collaborating on the Evanescence talk page. I'd just like to praise you for being bold and getting several Evanescence-related chores done. If you need any assistance, for example with creating Evanescence discography or changing references to their genre of music to alternative rock, just let me know and I'd be more than glad to help out. —Lantoka ( talk | contrib) 07:47, 8 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Awesome. I'll look over everything sometime this weekend and see if I can be of further assistance. Regrettably I haven't been on much lately due to university finals, moving home, then starting my new job, but the weekend is finally here and I'll have substantial time to catch up on Wikipedia. Keep me informed. =) —Lantoka ( talk | contrib) 20:13, 13 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
Cool, but, why have you deleted the info I added? It's real and i can prove it, i have pics of the cover, back, inter and the CD —eacz12

Marc Pugh thanks

edit

Thanks for the help with the references on the Marc Pugh article, I'm trying to make a really good, in depth article and it needed referencing like other good articles. I'll see what you did and play about with it in the sandbox, so again thanks for the help.--Childzy 15:22, 5 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

No problem. You basically put the website/book/newspaper you're referencing in tags like this <ref>www.example.com</ref> and then <references/> at the end where you want the references to be printed. See m:cite.php for more detail.--Cherry blossom tree 22:29, 5 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Chelsea F.C.

edit

First of all, the article was not stable so I removed it from the GA list, it will have to be renominated. Second of all, please review the oldest nominations on the GA nomination page since it is fairer for those who have been waiting for an assessment or a review of their article the longest. Lincher 14:08, 6 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Poutsa

edit

The user who'd made it had just vandalised an article and borderline-vandalised a few others, so I was mopping up. If you think it's worth an article, go ahead. However, is there anything that wouldn't be handled better at wiktionary? Morwen - Talk 14:36, 13 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

re user_talk:207.165.35.157

edit

childzy, you actually gave user_talk:207.165.35.157 a {{test5}} warning, which tells the person that they have been blocked. please don't use this in the future if you are not an administrator. i replaced it with a {{bv}} warning since the person had actually been vandalizing. thanks, --Alhutch 17:34, 14 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Recycling

edit

Regarding this edit. You (accidentally I'm sure) deleted a large part of the article when trying to edit the image. I've reverted for now, so if want to doing the image edit again feel free, but be careful not to remove any valid content (use show preview and/or show changes button before saving to check). Cheers, Petros471 18:17, 19 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Arghhh crap I'm sorry it keeps doing that to me on the Evanescence article, I think its to do with FireFox. I always show previews but generally to see if what i did worked, not to see if I deleted the article, again my apologies.--Childzy (Talk|Contribs) 18:21, 19 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
That's ok. I heard something about a bug with Firefox and the Google (think it was google) toolbar being installed caused a bug that has that effect. I sometimes edit using Firefox (usually Opera), but don't have any extra toolbars so never come across that problem personally. Petros471 18:24, 19 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Your vote on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Bruno Senna

edit

Hi Childzy,
Sorry to bother you, but I've updated the captions on the edits to make it perfectly clear which version you support. Please update your vote and state which version you support. Please use the naming located under the main caption in bold, large text. Thanks, --Fir0002 09:05, 25 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

edit

Please note that there is no reason to italicize All Music Guide in the professional reviews section of the album infobox. Only the names of magazines should be italicized (see the archived discussion at WikiProject Albums and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (titles)). Jogers (talk) 23:46, 2 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Edit of Towneley Hall pic

edit

Hi Childzy,
Thanks for asking, how's this: Image:Towneley Hall edit.jpg? I didn't want to go too far with the brightening as it brings out the noise too much. --Fir0002 07:46, 4 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Stars

edit

I've reverted a few of your edits. I put what I have to say about the matter here. Regards, Jogers (talk) 15:00, 6 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

HELP

edit

Please see these two articles and their talk pages. Ultra Rare Trax Vol.1 and Ultra Rare Trax Vol.2. This is a big edit war and its going nowhere, the articles need deleting, they are not encylopedic and are causing problems. --Childzy talk contribs 20:34, 6 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

I've deleted the articles. --Pilotguy (roger that) 20:49, 6 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Football AID 9 July - 16 July

edit
 
Thank you for participating in the Football AID vote this week.

FA Premier League has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.

The Fake Sound of Progress

edit

Hi, you're probably sick of me by now but I gotta ask this. You made articles for all the lostprophets singles today (I just made the last two), but the links you made designated the fake sound of progress page to The Fake Sound of Progress (song). I conformed with this for now, but is the (song) bit necessary? The Fake Sound of Progress is just a redirect to thefakesoundofprogress, so cant The Fake Sound of Progress be used for the single? The topline dabs i put on the pages can stay, allowing access to the page they're not on. Is there a problem with doing this? U-Mos 16:17, 10 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Agreed *merges pages* BTW thanks for finishing them, i started getting tired.--Childzy talk contribs 18:12, 10 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

No probs, they were easy pages to be my first! I'm going through the links to the (song) version now. Btw, I made a couple of changes to that lovely lostprophets template you did - you managed to get lee's name wrong! I also removed ilan rubin and several links that redirect to lostprophets or go nowhere. I won't take offence if you revert it, but i think that's how it should be. U-Mos 18:50, 10 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

I reverted some things, such as the Red links bacuse they are there so people can create article, i have also been working on the band members artciles. and BTW who is ilan rubin, is he the drummer??? --Childzy talk contribs 18:53, 10 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

AH I keep removing red links so oops! Personally I don't think band memeber articles are a good idea as none of them have done anything outside lostprophets. Ilan Rubin drums for the band, but he is not OF the band. He's not in their promo pics, or listed as a band member in Liberation Transmission etc. Therefore it is believed (by me) that he shouldn't be in their infobox or template or suchlike. U-Mos 18:59, 10 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Something else! IF band pages are deemed necessary, Richard Oliver should be Jamie Oliver, as for some reason that's what he calls himself. This will probably cause many chef-related problems, but that's how it should be I think. U-Mos 19:08, 10 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hmm it would cause big problems but if you are sure thats his name i will move it. --Childzy talk contribs 11:06, 11 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

I am sure about jamie oliver and ilan rubin U-Mos 17:18, 11 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Yep agree, good work. BTW Just wondering but who is lostprohpets current drummer??? Childzy (Talk|Contribs) 18:20, 11 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I try! They don't really have a drummer: Mike Chiplin left over a year ago, josh freese drummed on the new album and ilan rubin is currently touring with them, but he is not a member of the band. U-Mos 19:21, 11 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Very strange Childzy (Talk|Contribs) 18:13, 13 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Stu richardson.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Stu richardson.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:09, 10 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

I just wanted to point out that Ilan Rubin did do two tracks on Liberation Transmission and he is thanked, along with Josh Freese.

Fair use images in userspaces

edit

I've removed the fair use images of a football team's logo from your userspace. Sorry, but such images can't be used outside articles, for the reasons in WP:FU. You might want to resubmit your nomination to WP:ESP/U. Actually, as I've nominated my own userspace there, I hope you won't take this as sabotage ;-). But someone else would have had to if I didn't. --Sam Blanning(talk) 19:15, 11 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

*cries* my beloved burnley badge *cries more*. you did what you have to do
what about if i took a photo of the badge i have on my shirt?? Then it would be a self-made image thus allowing me to use it hmmm? Or what about the fact the bagde is more than 100 years old, wouldnt that make it be in the public domain?? Please get back to me --Childzy (Talk|Contribs) 19:27, 11 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
Sorry - to quote Wikipedia:Image use policy, "copyright is generated only by instances of "creativity", and not by the amount of labor which went into the creation of the work". If you take a photo of a logo, the creativity, and therefore the copyright, still lies with the logo's creator. --Sam Blanning(talk) 19:58, 11 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
Should have read the whole post... I'm not sure about the 100 years thing. The image's page currently claimed fair use rather than public domain, so I removed it based on that. Maybe ask on Wikipedia:Request for copyright assistance whether the image is actually in the public domain? --Sam Blanning(talk) 20:00, 11 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Frank Sinclair

edit

I have restored the NorthAm stub. As explained on the talk page, this is necessary because we have the unusual case of an England-born player who played in the World Cup for a North American team.--Runcorn 19:35, 13 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Re

edit

Hey buddy, I've been pretty busy lately so I haven't been around much. If you need help with Ev articles just leave me a message with what you need done and I'll do it in my free time. Hope things are going well for ya, and great job on the Ev articles! —Lantoka ( talk | contrib) 21:41, 13 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

System of a Down / discography

edit

I've responded to your comments and edits to the System of a Down page. The gist is that there is a consensus for merging the discography page to the main article page. Please see the talk page for the main article and the discography article for details. -- H·G (words/works) 19:38, 15 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Re:Stadium Arcadium trivia

edit

I don't feel that information is necessary, if you feel strongly about it why don't you integrate it. maxcap 19:44, 15 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

:(

edit

I'm sorry to hear your wikistress is so high. :(

If you need help reverting (since I can't usually find anything to revert), please contact me and I will help you to the best of my ability. The one and only Cliff 19:28, 18 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Vandals are a thorn in everyone's side. I'll keep an eye or three on the articles for you: I only really drift in and out of Wikipedia at the moment anyway. Have a great holiday! EVOCATIVEINTRIGUE TALKTOME | EMAILME | IMPROVEME 20:54, 18 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

I've added them here: feel free to add any more you're having trouble with! EVOCATIVEINTRIGUE TALKTOME | EMAILME | IMPROVEME 20:57, 18 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the extra info, it'll save me trawling through the page history. I know the feeling of frustration when an article gets targeted like that, so I'll be sure to keep eyes, nose and possibly ears on it. EVOCATIVEINTRIGUE TALKTOME | EMAILME | IMPROVEME 21:13, 18 July 2006 (UTC)Reply


"You have new messages"

edit

That's a particularly evil one! Good job I didn't click it: I noticed the links weren't the visited link colour... EVOCATIVEINTRIGUE TALKTOME | EMAILME | IMPROVEME 12:24, 20 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Aye, it's very malicious. Border-line, even... —Nightstallion (?) 12:06, 21 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
I would suggest you also complain on the talk page of another wikipedian. Cruel (even though I always check the link before clicking, has become normal practice)! fetofs Hello! 22:56, 21 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Re; 24.10.107.224

edit

Sorry, according to the contributions, indications are that this user hasn't vandalised within the past 24 hours, so therefore there is no need to block. However, if vandalism continues please notify me immediately and I will block. --Pilotguy (roger that) 04:48, 23 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Motto

edit

Thanks for helping out! It would be great if you could take over the whole thing since my schedule as predictable as stock market :) So, let me know. I scheduled the mottos for the whole month of July. Renata 21:27, 24 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Gosh, I am so behind at getting bact to all the people... :( Anyway, be my guest to take it over. Few things though: something needs to be done with a load of Latin mottos that are now on the talk page of MOTTO. Also, there might be a need to "recycle" some mottos as only few are comming in. Also, advertising. There was and idea initially to put it on the community portal, but I never got about to do it... If you need some help or something, be sure to ask. I will try to monitor things, but these days simply cannot promise anything :( Renata 20:02, 26 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
I'd be happy to be an adjunct overseer, and help you with clean up.Geo. 20:44, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Got it, maybe we should ask organizations to submit mottos and put an

article in the signpost.Geo. 20:10, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

How about we create a page called Under Review and put mottos under review there.Geo. 20:55, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
i am going to reject some of the mottos that are to long.Geo. 21:17, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
there are mottos on /under review that i would like your comments on Geo. 00:09, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
I scheduled through the 1st of August.Geo. 01:01, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Please cite sources

edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Ian Watkins (singer), but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! Can't sleep, clown will eat me 20:16, 25 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Please calm down, this is just a boilerplate template. In any event, can you please help provide sources for this article? It is in dire need of references. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 20:21, 25 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

RE: GA Failing

edit

Im sorry you don't want to expand the lead, maybe bring it to peer review to get other editos to comment.But the lead is all that needs improvements, so you can nominate it at WP:PR. If you have any questions, you may contact me at my talkp age, cheers —Minun Spiderman 12:29, 29 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Maybe you could improve the "Other projects" section —Minun Spiderman 12:38, 29 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
edit

Yep, me again... Anyway, you recently took out the unofficial lostprophets links, and quite right too I say ('cept for dragonninja), but they're starting to be added again. I don't have the time to do anything as I'm off on my hols in a minute, but you might want to add notices and warnings and suchlike. Just thought I'd let you know... U-Mos 10:54, 31 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

re:Motto

edit

I created under review because the new proposals page was cluttered. Geo. 16:28, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Why don't we create a reserve section on the approved page to

store 30 mottos that are to be used only when there none left.Geo. 16:42, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

[[User:Hunterd wishes to be an overseer. your opinion? Geo. 20:09, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Re:Motto

edit

I accept the control you gave me. wish you luck wherever you go. Geo. 23:47, 12 September 2006 (UTC)


I got tickets to the Ev concert!

edit

Hell yeah! One hundred dollars on eBay, but well worth it. =)

How are things going with you bro? —Lantoka ( talk | contrib) 10:21, 3 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Disambiguation Talk Request

edit

This is a form message being sent to all WikiProject Disambiguation participants. I may have found your page based on your contributions or your link repair user box on your user page. If you are not a member, please consider including your name on the project page. I recently left a proposed banner idea on the WikiProject Disambiguation talk page and I would appreciate any input you could provide. Before it can be approved or denied, I would prefer a lot of feedback from multiple participants in the project. So if you have the time please join in the discussion to help improve the WikiProject. Keep up the good work in link repair and thanks for your time. Nehrams2020 22:47, 9 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Happy First Edit Day!

edit
  Happy First Edit Day, Childzy/1, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!

Hope you enjoy it! Regards,   •The RSJ•   Talk | Sign Here 23:58, 1 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Happy First Edit Day, Childzy/1, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!

May you and Wikipedia be one on this joyous day!! By the way I couldn't agree more about hating anime. It's in my opinion completely retarted. If your in not in Asia and you have a book they should all be made to read front to back, and left to right. Not back to front, and right to left. --γιατί Sign Here | ESP. 00:47, 2 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

HAPPY FIRST EDIT DAY! from the BIRTHDAYCOMMITTEE
 
 

Wishing Childzy/1 a very Happy First Edit Day!

Have a fantastic day!

From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee

Happy first edit day! I know that this comment is not very unique... sorry. Greeves (talk contribs) 02:53, 2 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Happy FE day!!!

edit
  Happy First Edit day to you, Childzy/1, from Gravity!!! Have a nice time!

Happy First Edit Day!!! --GravityTalk 14:40, 2 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Evanescene Article

edit

Hey man,

Haven't seen you around lately. I hope all is well. I just thought I'd swing by and let you know that the Evanescence article achieved good article status. This calls for a celebration when you get back. ;)

Take care man, – Lantoka (talk) 04:59, 26 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Things are going very well for me man. I'm on Spring Break right now so I'm just chillin'. It's good to hear from you! – Lantoka (talk) 20:25, 12 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Karbassiyoon.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Karbassiyoon.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yonatan (contribs/talk) 09:05, 26 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Re:Heeeey

edit

Hey, good to see you back. I'm sure the Evanescence articles will appreciate it at any rate. Unfortunately, I'm no longer active in that field due to my absolute hatred of The Open Door. But oh well, live and let live. I'm not actually that active anywhere here at the moment (just monitoring the Lostprophets page for vandalism really), but I probably will be after all my exams are over. Talking of which, could you possibly support my move proposal at Talk:The Fake Sound of Progress (song) (if you agree, obviously)? You might remember we decided not to use the (song) bit when it was first created. U-Mos 11:56, 11 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Eden Project geodesic domes panorama.jpg

edit
 
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, Image:Eden Project geodesic domes panorama.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for nominating it! KFP (talk | contribs) 12:22, 15 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
 
POTD

Hi Childzy,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Eden Project geodesic domes panorama.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on August 5, 2007. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-08-05. howcheng {chat} 00:17, 24 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Boudin - Boudinage redirection

edit

hey Childzy!

Thx for your welcome message! how is it possible to redirect links? There are two articles, Boudin and Boudinage. The Boudin article deals with sausages exclusively. But Boudin is also a term for a special geological feature. So we need a disambiguation page, I guess. Furthermore it would be reasonable then to redirect the Boudin (geological) to Boudinage. I hope you understand, what I mean! EndoMax 11:44, 16 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thx for your support! I've chosen the second option! cheers! EndoMax 21:44, 17 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Would you be willing to add your support to the nomination of Derry City F.C. for FA status? Cheers. Danny InvincibleTalk|Edits 13:07, 21 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Audio samples

edit

I saw that you once had an audio sample uploaded of "By the Way". If possible, could you please re-upload the audio file? I'll place the necessary Fair Use rationale in, I just don't have any access to an audio cutter to upload to Wikipedia. Thanks and best wishes, NSR77 TC 14:44, 22 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Davidgale.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Davidgale.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:48, 31 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

James Milner PR

edit

I’d appreciate it if you could contribute to this PR of James Milner. Also I’m away till the 13th so if your able to address any issues raised that would be even better. Wikipedia:Peer review/James Milner Buc 21:47, 31 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Robert Ferro

edit

Please make sure you don't delete the actual link to the reference when you tweak it - otherwise it makes no sense.Zigzig20s 15:04, 8 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Also, you deleted his death date in the first sentence, which is unusual.Zigzig20s 15:47, 8 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hello his is vince lodato phd ---recently I edited the topic jason defense advisory group. Now I am banned from editing the piece. Considering the facts that I am a phd theoretical physicist and know this group very very well,worked for the US Congress on Nuclear Fusion issues, and have over 30 years in physics, ..what I wrote was by no means offense, rude but just the truth -- and someone is very fearful of the truth -- if this encyclopedia is not afraid of the truth -- then let it be said ---gather than bann what I wrote.

James Milner Career section

edit

Not really asking for full feedback on this article (although I wouldn’t mind it). I’d just like to know what you feel the best way the divide up the Career section is, by Club, by season, not at all or some other way. Please leave your reply under the section in my talk page named “Milner Career section”. Buc 16:33, 14 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Wade Elliot comment

edit

Hey, no problem. I didn't think your response was rude back then at all! Actually, to be honest, what I did in the article was rude, and was also probably against Wikipedia policy. I was just staring at the article having no clue what it was about and having no clue how to find out, and thought I'd be a little unorthodox to call attention to a problem that wasn't obvious to the article's authors. :) If I'd realized how new you were I probably wouldn't have done it at all, which makes me realize I should be more careful about such stuff. :)

Anyway, glad the comment is still giving you chuckles even now. :) Every so often I think it doesn't hurt to illustrate a problem by being funny, but I'm glad I didn't screw up and scare you off of Wikipedia or something. Jdavidb (talk • contribs) 13:25, 17 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Copy and paste move at Test match and Test match (disambiguation)

edit

Hello. Generally, one would move the page instead of copy and pasting it. Additionally one should fix up any double redirects created by the new redirect. Ewlyahoocom 20:01, 19 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

For the record it couldn't be moved as both pages originally existed so i had no option but to merge them. Also i was planning to fix redirects, hadn't had time yet. thanks --Childzy ¤ Talk 10:01, 20 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
When a move is blocked, generally one would request that an administrator move the page. For more info, see WP:RM. (And those double redirects aren't going to fix themselves.) Ewlyahoocom 04:37, 21 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
See also Wikipedia:How to fix cut and paste moves. Ewlyahoocom 08:14, 21 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

External link, Bulls & Bears

edit

I am surprised you find a link to TipsTraders.com irrelevant or inappropriate. I am a frequent viewer of the show, and a daily visitor at tipstraders, a site that keeps track of the recommendations made on the show (among others). I would think that most readers and viewers would find that information usefull.

6:25 PM, August 31, Bosch —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.167.137.230 (talk) 22:28, 31 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

I was removing them per (section) the links add no encyclodpedic value to the articles --Childzy ¤ Talk 22:31, 31 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Weird... there is no such requirement..?
9. Direct links to documents that require external applications (such as Flash or Java) to view the relevant content, unless the article is about such rich media. If you do link to such material make a note of what application is required.
Also
What should be linked says
"4. Sites with other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article, such as reviews and interviews."
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.167.137.230 (talk) 22:54, 31 August 2007 (UTC) Well, I'm new here, so forgive my ignorance :)Reply
6:40 PM, August 31, Bosch —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.167.137.230 (talk) 22:43, 31 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Well, there are plenty of deep links to actors on IMDB, which is quite similar to a deep link to Ben Stein on Tipstraders. I guess it is a matter of interpretation, and you are not about to accept a different opinion.
7:06 AM, September 1, Bosch —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.167.137.230 (talk) 11:06, 1 September 2007 (UTC)Reply