User talk:Chippla360
Add topic
Unblock request
[edit]
Chippla360 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)
Request reason:
I’m appealing a review of my account been unblocked, I now better understand how to contribute properly and responsibly, and I am willing to follow all rules if given another chance. I sincerely apologize for my previous actions, especially closing an article for deletion without proper checks. It was not done in bad faith, and I take full responsibility. Regarding the sockpuppetry concern, I am not connected to the accounts mentioned. If unblocked, I will make careful, constructive edits and contribute positively. Thank you for your time and consideration. Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 3:17 pm, 17 March 2026, last Tuesday (6 days ago) (UTC−4)
Decline reason:
Having reviewed the evidence at SPI and your contribution history, it is clear that this is not your first Wikipedia account. You're going to need to engage with the evidence more directly, and possibly also take a WP:SO to stand a chance of being unblocked. signed, Rosguill talk 04:16, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
@Rosguill, Alright I’m ready to engage and accept any conditions, what should I do to start with the process? Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 06:21, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
- File a new unblock request that addresses the evidence from the SPI. signed, Rosguill talk 13:31, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
Hi, Chippla360. You are unlikely to make any progress in being unblocked while using a chatbot-written unblock request. See WP:NICETRY. If you're willing to cooperate in "clarifying the situation if needed," well, it's needed, and it's needed in your own words. The sockpuppet investigation -- which you must be aware of since you've asserted the specific accounts are not yours -- indicates extremely concerning editing patterns, which you will almost certainly need to respond to directly (and again, without the use of an LLM). CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 08:28, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
Thank you so much @CoffeeCrumbs, I’m Still pleading that I’m considered for been unblocked, I’ve worked so hard on this account and have giving my contributions to the Wikipedia community, I’m also willing to learn, my previous actions where wrong and I’ve addressed the concern and I’m ready to accept any conditions for been unblocked this time. Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 00:40, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
Chippla360 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)
Request reason:
Very true, this isn’t my first Wikipedia account, I’ve been on Wikipedia for more than 10 Years and I’ve learnt the basics, tho I cannot recall my previous account and it’s certainly not the once I was tagged as a sockpettery, I believe admins reserves the right to block if they notice any suspicious behavioral edits that isn’t pleasing, I also acknowledge the fact some of my actions where not right in AFD, I’m here again to ask for a chance for the sake of my good contributions, it’s also evident that I’ve not used my account to seriously vandalize the platform as I’ve tried to be constructive to my best, I will take any condition for my unblock and also pled an admin should show compassion and take a close look that I’m not affiliated with the blocked users, I also noticed some G5 on my articles, but I’ll wait till I get unblocked for this sake, also bringing it to the knowledge of admins that I’m a Nigerian and our IPs here suck and most times a network can be re-sold to another customer, with this i believe I’ve addressed all the concerns, hoping for the best.Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 09:39, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you:
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. voorts (talk/contributions) 03:33, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.