Your submission at Articles for creation: James Chisholm (Senior) (November 27)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 19:04, 27 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:James Chisholm (Senior) has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:James Chisholm (Senior). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 20:46, 10 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Chisholm (Senior) (December 24)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 16:48, 24 December 2015 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Chis Maxwell, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 TT me 16:48, 24 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Chisholm (Senior) has been accepted

edit
 
James Chisholm (Senior), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:05, 2 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Chisholm

edit
Hello, repeating comment added on Jenks' talk page: -- I moved it- the bit in brackets is simply a disambiguation for people with the same name, and not a big deal. Senior is a term we rarely use, Junior is dabbed as (politician). (merchant), (pastoralist) would be fine. (Australian pioneer) may be better but we don't seem to use that one. I second the compliments above, clearly you are family but you have managed to avoid all the associated pitfalls and write a very respectable article Epistemos (talk) 10:52, 4 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for he clarification. My preference would be James Chisholm (Merchant). With thanks Chis 58.111.140.55 (talk) 10:54, 4 January 2016 (UTC)Reply