Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 00:14, 26 October 2017 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Chris bobbie13, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 00:14, 26 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

November 2017

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Zach Zenner has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:16, 17 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Zach Zenner. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 17:18, 17 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Zach Zenner, you may be blocked from editing. CLCStudent (talk) 17:18, 17 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Zach Zenner. CLCStudent (talk) 17:20, 17 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Kralizec! (talk) 17:21, 17 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Chris bobbie13/sandbox

edit
 

A tag has been placed on User:Chris bobbie13/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

U5, G11 Note to reviewing admin: this page reveals that the user is a juvenile, so suppression issues as well.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. L3X1 (distænt write) 22:05, 17 November 2017 (UTC)Reply