So far as I can tell, the key statements within the article are sourced adequately.
- If you have concerns that a source does not say what is being claimed in the article, then you should tag/note against the citation what the problem is. Template:Failed verification and Template:Verify source (if you doubt the statement but do not have access to the source given) could help with the tagging.
- If your concern is that the source given says one thing but you have a different source that says something different, then you can either
1) start a specific discussion about the statement and the conflicting sources on the talk page.
2) add to the article what the other source says. eg "historian X says this happened on the 13th June".
A blanket tag that the article is in some way incorrect does not help isolate and address the issues, and that as well as that it was the wrong template by my understanding is why I removed it. GraemeLeggett (talk) 11:58, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
- As my English is not good enough and the en:WP not my workground I thought it is helpful to leave the necessary information on the disc. If nobody is interested to pick it up, just forget it. -- Хрюша 14:02, 8 July 2011 (UTC)