Civil Rights5

August 2013

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. As well, you must immediately stop plagiarizing the sources. Use your own words rather than copying. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 22:15, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

In this article, it seems that you have claimed ownership. You dominate the article and post poorly sourced opinions and immediately remove edits that may be challenging to your strong opinion. In this case - you went ahead and returned some material that supports your strong opinion but deliberately left out others. Civil Rights5 (talk) 05:04, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

I've repeatedly explained to you why your edits cannot appear in the article in their current form. Since you do not yet understand how Wikipedia policy works, please educate yourself about it using the many resources available to new users. Do not continue to edit-war your personal opinion into the article. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 15:05, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Civil Rights5, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Civil Rights5! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Theopolisme (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Edit warring

Your recent editing history at Sexual abuse cases in Brooklyn's Haredi community shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. -- Diannaa (talk) 15:13, 9 August 2013 (UTC)