Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Parks-Valleta has been accepted

edit
 
Robert Parks-Valleta, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

EROS message 12:37, 7 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marvin Nuecklaus (January 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 20:52, 7 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, ClareNoI! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 20:52, 7 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Teahouse re propaganda

edit

Thank you for your leads regarding where else I can find answers to my questions and for your explanation of DS. I am surprised someone was happily reporting me to DS for asking questions. I believe he is also semi-retired just like one of my edit-reversers. Perhaps I should also do some reporting of my own.70.164.212.36 (talk) 02:12, 9 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Declined is not Rejected

edit

Reviewers decline drafts that they believe have potential, whereas Rejected is reserved to drafts with no hope. David notMD (talk) 03:08, 9 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Marvin Nuecklaus has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Marvin Nuecklaus. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 09:23, 10 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marvin Nuecklaus (June 15)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 18:36, 15 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Marvin Nuecklaus

edit

  Hello, ClareNoI. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Marvin Nuecklaus, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:05, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply