Classicadvt
October 2019
edit{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. MER-C 17:09, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Classicadvt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I didn't read your policies before posting a big error from my end. Now after going through the terms and conditions and policies mentioned, I have understood that it was wrong on my part to post the message I plan to use edits wisely to support wikipedia positively. This block is no longer required. You may kindly lift the ban. I promise never to repeat again. Thank you
Decline reason:
While saying you were wrong is a start, you must demonstrate that you understand you were wrong by explaining exactly what was wrong about what you did and how you will act differently in the future. This includes answering PhilKnight's question below about what it is you will edit about. You will also need to review conflict of interest and paid editing. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 10:19, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
What subjects do you want to edit, if unblocked? PhilKnight (talk) 19:02, 9 October 2019 (UTC)