You created two articles with no sources

edit

  Hello, I'm 64.134.64.190. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Medical transcription, but you didn't provide a reliable source. Please include citations (add sources). If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 64.134.64.190 (talk) 18:34, 17 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Edit to my comment for clarity: you created one totally unsourced article, Healthcare Documentation (Medical Transcription), about a topic that is already in existence on Wikipedia: Medical transcription.
You made large edits to Medical transcription without adding any sources. You deleted sources that other users had added.
Please include sources for any edits you make. Thank you. 64.134.64.190 (talk) 18:45, 17 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

You created an article that already exists - and with no sources

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Healthcare Documentation (Medical Transcription), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. 64.134.64.190 (talk) 18:48, 17 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Clrnewcomb1. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Healthcare Documentation (Medical Transcription), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:

  • avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
  • instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Since you claim that you are a volunteer at AHDI and are making the changes at the request of AHDI you have a clear conflict of interest. Meters (talk) 18:52, 17 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Medical transcription. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Meters (talk) 18:53, 17 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

January 2016

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Medical transcription. Please stop removing sources and adding unsourced content. Tom29739 (talk) 19:10, 17 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Medical transcription. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Please stop edit-warring. Tom29739 (talk) 19:16, 17 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  only (talk) 19:29, 17 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

RE: Untitled

edit

I am the one trying to make changes on the Medical Transcription page, and I am trying to create a Healthcare Documentation page. I am a volunteer for research and development for AHDI. They have given me a written sheet of what they would like posted on the Medical Transcription page and Healthcare Documentation. I have asked and I am waiting on some of the references needed, however, I do have some. I believe I need help on this. I appreciate your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clrnewcomb1 (talkcontribs) 19:09, 17 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

@Clrnewcomb1: It would appear that you may have a conflict of interest, which is why you seem to be having difficulty. People tend to do better when they edit Wikipedia for intrinsic reasons, not because someone else asked them too, paid them, etc.
I am aware that you are blocked at the moment, so will copy and paste this to your talk page, so you may reply. --I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 01:10, 18 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
I explained to you yesterday that you had a conflict of interest. Ignoring editors when they undo your edits and leave comments on your talk page is a sure way to get blocked. When you come back, please read the links that have been provided and ensure that you follow the instructions before you edit again. With your conflict of interest you should not be making these edits yourself. Instead, propose them on the article's talk page and attempt to get consensus that the edits are worthwhile. And the argument that the AHDI wants these changes made is not going to help. You will need to convince other editors that the proposed changes will improve the article. We really don't care what the AHDI wants in the article. Meters (talk) 18:32, 18 January 2016 (UTC)Reply