Cnfnfnfnfnfncnfnfncnfm
March 2014
edit
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cracker Barrel. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Orlady (talk) 03:15, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Cnfnfnfnfnfncnfnfncnfm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was reverting vandalism on a page and an administrator mistook that I was vandalizing. I have seen many vandal reverts, it's just that I decided to join Wikipedia, and then when I saw the vandalism on Cracker Barrel, I reverted it, but I couldn't believe even administrators would revert it back. Can you unblock me please?
Decline reason:
Right. You just happened (by unspecified means) across a specific, inconspicuous reversion that would have been buried under miles of Recent Changes by that time, the same day it was made, and started reverting it repeatedly. Well, that was about as convincing as I expected, but I just had to satisfy my curiosity as to what convoluted explanation might be pulled in to explain this. Removing talk page access so you don't - innocently, I'm sure - end up erasing the declined status of your request again. - Vianello (Talk) 04:11, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.