Coaster7

User:Coaster7/Savoy

There you go. You need to improve the sourcing before you resubmit it to DRV for approval. Spartaz ^Humbug! 19:32, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

It might be an idea to put this work in progress in the page space of Wikipedia:WikiProject Seduction? As more easily others could work on it there, I'd have to double check if this is appropriate but I'd think so. Mathmo ^Talk 04:16, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Hello, Coaster7. You have new messages at Star Mississippi's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

again :) StarM 04:05, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

And now at User:Coaster7/Lovesys. Apologies for taking so long. Spartaz ^Humbug! 22:48, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your note...

I'm probably not going to have time to review your article in depth, but please make sure it establishes notability per WP:CORP via reliable sources. StarM 02:25, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Hello, Coaster7. You have new messages at Stifle's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Stifle (talk) 13:40, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Nick Savoy

(from here) I have also worked on the "Nick Savoy" page that was previously deleted. After using your approach on the Love Systems page, I tried to answer 1) who is Nick Savoy? and 2) What does Nick Savoy do?. Could you help me on improving the article on Nick Savoy? Thanks in advance Suntag. Coaster7 (talk) 02:22, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

(from here) The approach doesn't involve seeking to answer any question. Whatever the reliable sources say about the topic is what goes in the article in chronological order. As for the Nick Savoy article, it reads he was born under his stage name and then he received his B.A. He was born under his real name and I'm sure something happened to him before he received his B.A. You should work the last eight or so sentences into the article chronologically. As for the general approach, first gather all your raw research material into one Microsoft word document in chronological order. I added some links at User talk:Coaster7/Nick Savoy that should help you find the research material from Google. To find reliable source material not indexed by Google news, books, scholar, go through the pages here looking for news articles, etc. Arrange everything in the MS word document chronologically, create your citation strings for each entry, and save as Nick Savoy research. Then copy that document to Nick Savoy article. Open the MS word Nick Savoy article and add the coding for Template:Biography to the top. Use that as the framework within which to develop the article. Next, go through each reliable source, starting at the top. Apply whatever you find to the draft article. Once done with a source, erase it and move onto the next one. Repeat until all the sources have been erased. Next display a preview of your draft article in Wikipedia. This will show how the article will appear without actually saving the article. Read what is shown and change and save the Nick Savoy article Microsoft word document accordingly. That will help you avoid losing changes &action=edit pages if your computer get disconnected from the Internet. Then copy the Nick Savoy article Microsoft word document to your open Wikipedia edit page and hit the preview button. Keep repeating until your draft is ready to be posted to Wikipedia. -- Suntag ☼ 14:27, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

I would make sure I had my three best independent sources 1, 2, 3 in the footnotes. If the subjects have been covered substantively in independent sources then they are notable. That's the key to article inclusion. Everything else is just a clean-up, tightening and editing issue. I would add the best sources I could find to both articles. This is the best one I found for Love Systems [1], I would even add a quote to the citation itself "the Post tested out Mystery's strategies, and according to boyporter Justin Rocket Silverman, they work. Kind of. Silverman took a class with Love Systems, a pickup-training organization (originally started by Mystery but no longer run by him — the whole boring story is here) that teaches classes to men who think that love can be found in places like the Park." These are some of the sources for the other article [2] ,[3], [4]. You may have other sources just to verify information in the article, but put your best sources out front so people don't have to dig deep to see if this is a leigitimate topic. Good luck. ChildofMidnight (talk) 00:12, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

COI

May I ask what your role with Love Systems and Nick Savoy is? Maybe this doesn't even apply but I encourage you to consult WP:COI in regards to this matter, as it seems you have a very intimate relationship with these groups that may be grounds for conflict of interest. Benjamin Dominic (talk) 08:46, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

I'm not affiliated with anyone. I do have a sincere interest in the seduction community and its presence on Wikipeda.06:02, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

But the only pages that you have contributed to are Love Systems and Nick Savoy (the creator of Love Systems) and things pertaining to these and these only. If it is such a "sincere interest," as you say, why have you not contributed to other pages? I will maintain good faith, though it seems you're line stepping here. Benjamin Dominic (talk) 19:09, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

WP:OUTING

Please see WP:OUTING with regard to this edit. Plastikspork (talk) 04:56, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Tina Knowles

Hi. :) I wanted to let you know that this article, which you nominated for PROD in April 2009, has been restored after it was de facto challenged by another contributor pasting the content back on the project. Since PRODs are only used for uncontroversial deletions, it's no longer an appropriate subject for PRODding, but if you still think it does not meet inclusion standards, you may wish to consider WP:AfD. Thanks. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 23:09, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Blocked as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. (blocked by MuZemike 08:41, 30 November 2009 (UTC))
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Coaster7 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am not certain why I am being blocked or accused as being some copy account. I've contributed two articles to Wikipedia (Love Systems and Nick Savoy) in collaboration with other Wikipedia administrators and contributors. Plus, I have a lot of edits (easily over 150) on different topics and articles over a year since I've been contributing. Hence, I've contributed to AfD before. You can go over my editing history and see that I've had no malicious intent or disrupted any articles. So I'm not certain why my account is being blocked while I'm helping out. Coaster7 (talk) 16:22, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This is about as clear a case of abusive sockpuppetry that I've ever seen. I've found multiple cases of using multiple accounts to feign consensus. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 04:57, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.