CoconutOctopus
|
||
Accessible broadband article
editHello,
First of all, thank you very much for taking the time to review my draft and leaving feedback.
I fully understand your comment on the writing style and I will endeavour to rewrite the draft in a more encyclopedia appropriate style before resubmitting. But your other comment (relating references), I may need a little more help with if that's okay. I was hoping that you could expand on what specifically you want me to do to make the draft acceptable in relation to the point raised as I do not quite understand. I believe this topic refers to an important societal inequality that deserves a wikipedia article so any help you can offer me in getting this published would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jedav21 (talk • contribs) 21:14, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
Please consider the matter
editYes, but I think they are usable sources on Wikipedia. I noticed that every source given here is available on Google search. And if we talk about the open source, if the news in the name of the founder of Prothom Alo newspaper is not open source? Consider that. Madian.980087 (talk) 22:02, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Being available on a google search doesn't mean a source meets the criteria for use on Wikipedia. Sources need to be independent, reliable, and in depth. The sources you use are not independant. CoconutOctopus talk 22:11, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- This is definitely correct. I found an open source and added it, more sources may be found if search. Madian.980087 (talk) 22:45, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- It's your job as the one creating the article to find suitable sources and ensure the article is reasy for publishing before submission, not the other way round. CoconutOctopus talk 22:49, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- righ you are.thank you so mach ! Madian.980087 (talk) 22:54, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- I have also added the reference. Madian.980087 (talk) 23:01, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- righ you are.thank you so mach ! Madian.980087 (talk) 22:54, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- It's your job as the one creating the article to find suitable sources and ensure the article is reasy for publishing before submission, not the other way round. CoconutOctopus talk 22:49, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- This is definitely correct. I found an open source and added it, more sources may be found if search. Madian.980087 (talk) 22:45, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Article
editWhy delete the article? It already has enough sources. Synthxd (talk) 01:42, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
Kyongsi is a real village.
editMy friend, Misto who lives in Kyongsi and talks via post, said she lives in Kyongsi. Kyongsi is real but poorly documented. It is secret and does not exist on a map. TheWikipedian123z (talk) 16:34, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- That is not verifiable and thus not able to be used on Wikipedia. CoconutOctopus talk 16:35, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Kyongsi is a hoax
editKyongsi is a hoax. It can be deleted. TheWikipedian123z (talk) 17:11, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Diffusion Fundamentals
editDear CoconutOctopus, on October 20th you rejected the article Diffusion Fundamentals due to a lack of secondary literature. Please have you read the reasoning behind this on the associated discussion page? By the way, the article has been accepted in the German Wikipedia since April 2023. Best regards Martin Geisler (talk) 10:53, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Enrg Tech LTD
editHi Dear, I have recently published an article about Enrg Tech LTD and you added deletion tag. Jodie244 (talk) 13:45, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Article References
editI am wondering if my article is ready to publish-- Do you know what sources you consider to be unreliable? RigbyNicholson (talk) 00:55, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- My article is located at Draft:Owen Middle School RigbyNicholson (talk) 00:58, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Please do not write articles or drafts about minors
editAnd the sources didn't show notabilty Doug Weller talk 16:04, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Uh, what? CoconutOctopus talk 16:07, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Was this a mistake? I've written one album total in my time here and it's for a niche album? CoconutOctopus talk 16:11, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Doug Weller again I'm really not sure what you're talking about, I've never written any biographies of anyone let alone minors. Are you sure you have the right user? CoconutOctopus talk 16:41, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- A biography of a minor. Draft:Ruby Brochtrup Doug Weller talk 17:17, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Doug Weller I didn't make that article and I have literally no idea who did or why you think it's me. CoconutOctopus talk 18:08, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Because it’s in your deleted contributions Doug Weller talk 18:13, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what you're talking about as, once again, I did not create that page. Can you maybe go back and double check and then warn the user who actually did? CoconutOctopus talk 18:15, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, I’m wrong. You declinrd it. Aplologies. Doug Weller talk 18:15, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Because it’s in your deleted contributions Doug Weller talk 18:13, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Doug Weller I didn't make that article and I have literally no idea who did or why you think it's me. CoconutOctopus talk 18:08, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- A biography of a minor. Draft:Ruby Brochtrup Doug Weller talk 17:17, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
Recent ANI info
editHi! Sorry to bother you, I didn't want to put this on the main noticeboard (especially since I'm not experienced enough to weigh in on stuff there, I just read it occasionally whilst gaining experience). I thought you might want to take a look at a recent edit summary for Clioos here, which might help explain the background: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=165582440
I've not pinged them since it seems pretty sensitive info and could be totally unrelated, but I also wanted to let someone know what I saw - just delete this once you've read it if you like. Anyway, sorry again for bothering you and thanks for your time! Blue-Sonnet (talk) 18:18, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
Hang on, I just saw the summaries for 26 Oct (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=165392548). Now I'm just really confused and might go for a lie-down and leave this for more experienced hands to figure out...- Never mind, turns out I was worried for nothing - that first comment I saw made me really worried for them, but it looks like it wasn't warranted. Blue-Sonnet (talk) 18:22, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
A question
editSo basically I need 2 refs on all? or only some. Laffuble (talk) 01:53, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Page mover granted
editHello, CoconutOctopus. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.
Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving a redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect
is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.
Useful links:
- Wikipedia:Requested moves
- Category:Requested moves, for article renaming requests awaiting action.
If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! SilverLocust 💬 20:20, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Article W.T.F Witnessing True Fashion
editDear Reviewer,
I am contesting the speedy deletion of the "W.T.F Witnessing True Fashion" article under criterion A7. I believe this article meets the criteria for notability and is worthy of inclusion on Wikipedia for the following reasons:
- Notability and Independent Coverage:
- The brand "W.T.F Witnessing True Fashion" has received recognition in independent, reliable sources, which establishes its notability within the Indian fashion industry. The brand's achievements, such as reaching significant revenue milestones, have been reported by reputable sources including The Print and ANI News. These sources provide independent verification of the brand's significance, going beyond simple announcements to cover its market impact and community initiatives.
- Unique Market Position and Industry Contributions:
- W.T.F Witnessing True Fashion is a notable player in the Indian streetwear market, specifically targeting Gen Z and Millennials with a blend of modern streetwear and Indian cultural influences. This unique positioning makes the brand stand out within the fashion industry, especially in India, where it resonates with an emerging segment of younger consumers. Its sustainable practices also reflect the growing shift towards eco-friendly fashion, aligning with global industry trends.
- Neutral and Encyclopedic Tone:
- The article has been revised to ensure that it adheres to Wikipedia’s Neutral Point of View (NPOV) policy. Any promotional language has been removed, and the article now focuses solely on verifiable facts. The content reflects an unbiased perspective on the brand’s activities, achievements, and impact.
- Efforts to Improve Integration:
- I am actively working to link this article to other relevant Wikipedia pages, such as articles related to streetwear, sustainable fashion, and Indian youth culture, to improve its integration within Wikipedia. I am also incorporating additional independent sources to further validate the brand’s notability and ensure compliance with Wikipedia’s verifiability standards.
- Commitment to Further Improvements:
- I am committed to enhancing this article further by adding more independent and reliable sources that discuss the brand’s role and impact in the fashion industry. I will continue to follow Wikipedia’s guidelines on notability and verifiability to ensure that this article meets the necessary standards.
Thank you for considering this contest to the speedy deletion notice. I am dedicated to making the necessary improvements to align this article with Wikipedia’s content policies. Kkmud (talk) 17:46, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not interested in what ChatGPT has to say about it, so please use your own words. CoconutOctopus talk 17:50, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
Draft:LifeandScars
editHey, what's happening with Draft:LifeandScars? The two new accounts, whose socks are they, Vlioos? I've blocked CoconutOctopusplzforgiveme as !HERE, but Givemeonemorechanceplease hasn't quite crossed that line yet (IMO); however, should I block them for socking? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:42, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, both Vlioos, who is actually Clioos - see this SPI I've opened. Thank you! CoconutOctopus talk 08:44, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)