Cody is Awesome!
Articles for deletion nomination of The Guardians of Childhood
edit
I have nominated The Guardians of Childhood, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Guardians (film). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 00:58, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 | Blocked as a sockpuppet You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Bambifan101 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log). Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted. Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block. |
--PMDrive1061 (talk) 03:16, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Cody is Awesome! (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have done nothing wrong to deserve to be blocked
Decline reason:
Hi. Bye. --jpgordon::==( o ) 21:31, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Definite Sockpuppet?
edit | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Wait a minute. I thought this username WAS one of Bambifan101's sock puppets? This account's USER page says that he is a suspected sock puppet, and I don't have permissions to edit that user page... If one is going to declare that this username is a sock puppet on the talk page, I would suggest saying that on the user page too instead of letting them contradict. MadisonGrundtvig (talk | contribs) 21:43, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
- Though you're technically right, I don't think re-classifying five-year-old socks is among Wikipedia's most pressing problems. Sockpuppetry was confirmed via CheckUser. Huon (talk) 22:06, 17 February 2014 (UTC)