Coiman

October 2024

Hello, I'm Meters. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Islam, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. And please read WP:MINOR Meters (talk) 00:15, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello @Meters. I noticed your message. Thank you for reminding me. I will put an appropriate cite link next time I edit. Thank you. @Coiman Coiman (talk) 00:30, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at WikiShia, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Meters (talk) 00:16, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Schwalmstadt, you may be blocked from editing. Jiffles1 (talk) 01:43, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Max Capote. What are you doing? Do not change the date on maintenance tags. That article did not even exist in 2013. Meters (talk) 03:21, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

And don't add malplaced and useless refs. Your edit to East of England twice referenced the name "East of England", once with a spammy tourism site, and once with a wiki site. You have already been pointed to WP:RS. Meters (talk) 03:27, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

And you've done this on several other articles too. I've had to undo almost every one of your edits that I have checked. If it isn't useless cites on the name of the article it's for unsourced claims, using non reliable sources, contradicting cited info, or adding a supposed homeurl that has been squatted on. You really need to stop. You can be blocked for WP:CIR even if you are acting in good faith. Meters (talk) 03:42, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: TharProductionPak (October 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Saqib was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:TharProductionPak and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Saqib (talk I contribs) 08:11, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Coiman! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Saqib (talk I contribs) 08:11, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello Saqib,

Thank you . I will join at the teahouse.

-Coiman Coiman (talk) 20:25, 26 October 2024 (UTC)