ColdWind

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, ColdWind! I am Calaka and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Calaka (talk) 13:05, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Terrorism

If the Japanese Red Army was no terrorist group, what was? I am not starting any edit-war or even dispute about this, but I am a bit puzzled by your sticker...If you have any knowledge about them or the other Japanese Red Armies, please do share it.--Radh (talk) 17:21, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

No, you have all the rights to use this thing. I guess, I just thought you were acting out of a personal conviction or something.--Radh (talk) 05:22, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

ACTA

I see you edited the ACTA Article and reverted my movement of "legal framework" to the support section. I understand that it does not well fit with the rest of the support section, however that paragraph speaks very much in favour of the ACTA. Also it is written like an official statement and has a dubious tone. The sources it cites are only the highly censored official releases. I personally am in favour of erasing it and make a note about it in either the support or the provisions section, because it is both unimportant and boring. What do you think about it? Please respond here or on the ACTA talkpage.92.230.83.9 (talk) 18:37, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Prewiew! 92.229.208.237 (talk) 11:01, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Acta - "parties"

Hi there, re the parties - should that not be "negotiating parties", as the treaty has not yet been signed. I tried to change it, but it messed up the box template. Maybe you can help. --SasiSasi (talk) 18:39, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Trident Media Guard

A tag has been placed on Trident Media Guard requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Fæ (talk) 15:33, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

About Bitcoin translation reward board

Is this bounty reward available for now?Cerevisae (talk) 19:44, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)