|
This user talk page has been temporarily protected from editing to prevent this blocked user from using it inappropriately. If you have come here to issue a new warning to this user, it means the block has expired. Please unprotect the page, ask an administrator to do so, or request unprotection here, and remove this notice. |
(1) I entered my reply on the RfC page on March 20th, but the other people, who entered their names there, did so before that day, and little seems to be happening since that day. (2) The user who started the blocking (a) was needlessly aggressive from the beginning, (b) didn't properly study my edits, (c) gave a biased report in the RfC, (d) doesn't understand the issue of integrity of science, (e) really should have a good discussion with his professor on his behaviour (and, I'm sorry, I still think so). Colignatus 02:52, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
- it has been decided by the community via your rfc, that until you realise the errors of your ways we will not unblock you Benon 08:34, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
- By way of clarification, if you email me or another admin and undertake:
- not to threaten other users with reporting to their academic superiors, and
- to withdraw your demands for money from Wikipedia users, and
- to discuss changes to articles on talk pages,
- then you may be unblocked. Stifle (talk) 11:37, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
- By way of clarification, if you email me or another admin and undertake:
- it has been decided by the community via your rfc, that until you realise the errors of your ways we will not unblock you Benon 08:34, 28 March 2006 (UTC)