January 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm Allthefoxes. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Lancaster, Massachusetts— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --allthefoxes (Talk) 21:00, 5 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lancaster, Massachusetts. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. UkPaolo/talk 21:02, 5 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lancaster, Massachusetts, you may be blocked from editing. --Hammersoft (talk) 21:05, 5 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bolton, Massachusetts.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Bolton, Massachusetts was changed by Colinburke8 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.9821 on 2016-01-05T21:11:06+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:11, 5 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   UkPaolo/talk 21:11, 5 January 2016 (UTC)Reply