this "essay" includes material that is somewhat problematic.
one the one hand it claims to be "quoting actual wikipedia editors", but does so without citations OR names; making it impossible to verify.
on the other hand, making a "collection" of editors one dislikes, especially listing them publicly, hovers on the edge of being a policy violation; for one thing, as a kind of "personal attack"; possibly a violation in other ways as well.
i would suggest that the author rethink this piece.
i make this note "for the record" Lx 121 (talk) 08:42, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: The Essay does not seek to shame named editors, and, in fact, the author was commanded to removed anything which could identify any editors. I suggest that the positions espoused by such persons as are cited here are the actual violations of Wikipedia policies, by the way. Collect (talk) 13:17, 21 September 2017 (UTC)