Colonial1896

Colonial1896 (talk) 23:38, 30 March 2017 (UTC) Colonial1896 (talk) 23:51, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Colonial1896 (talk) 00:09, 31 March 2017 (UTC)Rome: The article needs better organization. After a chronological explanation of the emperors, the rest of the page is an odd jumble of sub categories. Why isn't culture a subcategory of society? Also, why not place technology within a subcategory of scientific advancement, together with law, economy, and education?

Languages of the Roman Empire: The pages are organizational strangely put together. I recommend Regional Languages be placed under each region the language is spoken. Thus the article can be more concise and users can easily navigate the page. How history shapes language can be further explored in a separate section towards the end, similar to the "Geographical Distribution". "Language Reform Movements" should be placed last and Ritual/legal language should have its own section.

Sino-Roman Relations: The section "Analysis of Skeletons from Roman London" is inconclusive and makes claims that cannot be treated as fact. The sources themselves are poor and I see no reason to keep this section. The article itself states that their is no guarantee the remains are Chinese or from the same time period. In fact, the section "Hypothetical military contact" is more concrete than the other section.

Colonial1896 (talk) 00:09, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Colonial1896 (talk) 23:58, 30 March 2017 (UTC) Colonial1896 (talk) 23:51, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Colonial1896 (talk) 23:38, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Colonial1896, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 23:19, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Aquazi Twelve Tables Peer Review

Colonial1896 (talk) 14:58, 21 April 2017 (UTC)Great draft! I appreciate the choice of the article. It definitely needs improvement and could use some content. Maybe you can dig up some more information on the significance of the twelve tables not just in the context of American history but more immediate events after the sack of Rome. As one of the first traditions of an enduring law code, I feel like there would be plenty of material on this. Regarding you sources section, first there needs to be a space between "Gauls" and "under". Are their any direct links or accredited sources you can reference in a bibliographic section?Colonial1896 (talk) 14:58, 21 April 2017 (UTC)