Welcome!

Hello, Comatose51, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Lst27 20:11, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)

edit

Hello. Please note that you can write birthday attack; there's no need for the underscore in birthday_attack, and the former looks better IMO. Michael Hardy 22:46, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

       I didn't edit that part... Wrong person.  Comatose51 12:45, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Zhang (surname)/Zhang Ziyi

edit

Uh, Zhang Ziyi's surname is referred to (along with other surnames that are rendered "Zhang" in pinyin) in Zhang (surname). --Nlu (talk) 12:54, 4 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

It is definitely ambiguous since the article mostly talk about the more common Zhang. Perhaps we should list her name in a different section.Comatose51 13:34, 5 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Chi-ling Lin Mediation Request

edit

I've accepted the request for mediation on this article. Please leave a quick note on my talk page that you're aware of this and we can begin the discussion there. Flakeloaf 16:39, 20 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

From your comments while editing Opinions on the Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy, you seem to be under the impression that there is a policy permitting removal of paid links from Wikipedia. There is no such policy. Where we can, we prefer free links, but if they are unavailable, paid links are cartainly permitted. You should not remove information from WIkipedia merely because it is referenced by paid Internet sites. - Nunh-huh 05:49, 8 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please read: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:External_links#Sites_requiring_registration Comatose51 05:50, 8 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

I've read the style guideline, and I've seen its history. The guideline you are misreading defines itself as not applying to citation links. Reference links to paid sites are permitted. - Nunh-huh 05:55, 8 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

I see you've been removing mainly links from one site. You might well have a good reason for doing so. (If, as you say, they were spammed, for example). But that reason really shouldn't be "you have to pay". There's no requirement that references even be online! If you have any question about this, perhaps you should start a discussion at the talk page of the guideline you cited...but there's never been a ban on subscription-required references. - Nunh-huh 05:57, 8 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Alright, it seems that I'm wrong in regards of the policy. I was mixing up external links and citations. But how does one even verify the citations if we can't get access to them? Comatose51 05:59, 8 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

You have to rely on others to do that, if you don't have a subscription. - Nunh-huh 06:00, 8 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
I see. Is there an easy way to mass undo my edits? Just wasted a good 30 minutes chasing down those links. :-( Thanks BTW. Comatose51 06:02, 8 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
I can take care of it... - Nunh-huh 06:06, 8 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
OK, I think I've reverted everything with an edit summary where you gave "paid" as a reason. You might want to look at the others if you think they might need undoing. - Nunh-huh 06:10, 8 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
Thanks a lot for all the help. Comatose51 06:15, 8 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
No problem. - Nunh-huh 06:20, 8 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
If you'd like a copy/paste of a particular citation's source from Stratfor, I believe User:Geo Swan has a subscription - so you could probably politely ask him to check for you. Sherurcij (Speaker for the Dead) 07:01, 8 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Dambit we marry young roun'cher...

edit

But not even Tommy Moore young...thanks! Feel free to crawl through my other edits as well. Flowanda | Talk 03:12, 19 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

LOL. That thought actually did cross my mind. It was a different era back then but 11 seem a little young even for the South.Comatose51 (talk) 03:15, 19 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

NowCommons: Image:DSC 0026.NEF.jpg

edit

Image:DSC 0026.NEF.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:International Finance Centre Hong-Kong China.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:International Finance Centre Hong-Kong China.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 08:55, 26 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Good catch

edit

This was an oops by us. Thanks for correcting it! =D Cheers, -talk- the_ed17 -contribs- 03:47, 13 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

No worries, glad to help out. Comatose51 (talk) 03:51, 13 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)Reply