CommotioCordis

Hello! Excited to contribute to the Wikipedia community!

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:ScienceForeverLife per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ScienceForeverLife. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  firefly ( t · c ) 16:27, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Why am I being accused of being a sockpuppet? Let me see the details and the evidence please. CommotioCordis (talk) 18:06, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

I would like a full investigation and an explanation. I have nothing to do with multiple accounts and this accusation makes zero sense. CommotioCordis (talk) 18:07, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CommotioCordis (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I do not know why I have been falsely accused as a sockpuppet and demand to have a full investigation CommotioCordis (talk) 18:05, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

The investigation was conducted and you may view it at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ScienceForeverLife. If that information has led to the wrong conclusion, please tell how. It could also be that this is meat puppetry, which is treated the same. 331dot (talk) 19:12, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

I do not have multiple accounts and nothing to do with ScienceForeverLife. Why am I being banned? What evidence has there been presented? I would like to have an explanation for this drastic action.CommotioCordis (talk) 02:28, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Checkusers are not allowed to make such evidence public. If they do, they're in trouble, both wikipedically and legally. You may e-mail privately WP:ARBCOM with your own evidence. tgeorgescu (talk) 20:38, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.