mae young

edit

i'm pretty sure the "dumbass" i was talking about was another ip guy. 24.231.78.74 (talk) 10:22, 12 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Regardless. Name-calling over a disagreement on an edit helps nobody. --Connelly90[AlbaGuBràth] (talk) 09:24, 13 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Viscera

edit

Yeah exactly. You knew him as Viscera before you knew him as Nelson Frazier. So did I. You are right though, my first edit was too long. I agree with your final edit. starship.paint (talk | ctrb) 10:46, 20 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Perhaps you could weigh in at Talk:Deaths in 2014#Wrestlers.27_character names. Thank you. starship.paint (talk | ctrb) 13:20, 20 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

February 2014

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Scotland are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Mutt Lunker (talk) 14:28, 26 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks; but I've been editing for years on-and-off. I've found that providing some slight humour (not taking over a topics with it) in talk pages has encouraged newer editors. Especially with subjects that are typically totally discouraging to new editors due to overzealous debating; like Scotland related subjects. --Connelly90 14:39, 26 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
You should know better then. You were encouraging threads to go or stay off-topic. I was finding it increasingly tedious checking a succession of irrelevant posts. Mutt Lunker (talk) 14:55, 26 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
Thanks mum --Connelly90 14:57, 26 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

August 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Celtic F.C. may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • no=?|nat=BUL|pos=MF|name=[[Aleksandar Tonev]]|other=on loan from [[Aston Villa F.C.|Aston Villa]]}}}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:22, 11 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Connelly90. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Help please? Love your Dumbarton Academy page

edit
  Help please? Love your Dumbarton Academy page
Hi Connelly90, please excuse this message if it is naïve or sent to the wrong place; I am really new to this with little technical experience! I noticed you were the originator of the Dumbarton Academy page. I am now registered as a user.

I have been approached by several people to ask why I have never been listed under 'Notable Alumni'. I have never given it a thought, but on reading the other bios, especially those with a State Honour, I thought that I perhaps merited entry. I tried adding my name, which worked, but has since been deleted by a robot. I was hoping to link my name with a URL to a page describing my background, but I never got that far as I was obviously doing something wrong. I have all the info together but don't know how to proceed as the language is just gobblededook to me! Are you able to help or is there anyone I could approach to put the info onto the page in the correct format? My family would be so proud to see my name there and Former Pupils would also appreciate the entry. I'm not a feminist but I think it would be the first female addition to the 'Alumni'. I can send you the info to an email address if it would help. Kind regards, Val Ferguson OBE ValFOBE (talk) 15:26, 18 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Aecom

edit

Ta for your old note on AECOM page. I pruned the PR there right now. It looked bad indeed. Zezen (talk) 07:35, 13 June 2019 (UTC)Reply