"Interstate compact for placement of children.."

I am here for wisdom and as a victim of child sexual abuse..

Overcoming to be a part of the solution..

authorities who fail to protect the children who are still today being placed in the hands of those who exploit and profit from the suffering of children..

WHO IS HERE?

STATE CUSTODY

edit

I'm not sure what the site will do but I know that I have to inform the people of my own personal knowledge ..


"Child protection agencies "

With court action on the " best interest " of a child who has been classified as

"neglected and dependent "

By my own eyes I've seen the most precious and helpless of all the world become a commodity for the

 " profit of social services workers.."

I must do more research on other documented cases of the emerging issues that will no longer be able to be ignored.. Connie Ford Johnson (talk) 03:28, 7 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Throw Away Children

edit

Related research in "human trafficking in America "

Has links to the  sources and discussions about the number of children who are DISQUALIFIED from the count.  .

Throw away children , from my personal first hand knowledge are not found to be reliable sources of information in Scholarly studies of the intellectual society..

This is a place for facts and knowledge that has been previously unattainable ..

Thrown away children usually are not found eager to speak of the chronological events that label them and debunk their knowledge....

First hand knowledge that can help shape the future of children who have rights that are not upheld by the law...

Education and social reintegration programs have been unavailable due to lack of information to our past generations.

Burden of proof of childhood negligence and trauma from abusive out of home placement and illegal abandonment of dumping children in other states through the interstate compact for placement of children for fostering and adoptions that fail to protect and accountability is non existing... especially when families are not financially able to fight for their relatives children...

Its not easy to think that these children don't matter... just because they have grown up ..

Connie Ford Johnson (talk) 14:00, 7 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Welcome and Soapbox concern

edit
 
Some cookies to welcome you!  

Welcome to Wikipedia, Connie Ford Johnson! Thank you joining the ranks of Wikipedia editors. I am Daask and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Your initial contributions raised some concerns for me that you may run into issues with our policies in the future. First, I wanted to note that Wikipedia is not a soapbox or a place to promote your ideas. This applies to both articles, talk page discussions, and user pages. According to our policy at WP:SOAPBOX, content hosted in Wikipedia is not for:

  1. Advocacy, propaganda, or recruitment of any kind: commercial, political, scientific, religious, national, sports-related, or otherwise. An article can report objectively about such things, as long as an attempt is made to describe the topic from a neutral point of view. You might wish to start a blog or visit a forum if you want to convince people of the merits of your opinions.
  2. Opinion pieces. Although some topics, particularly those concerning current affairs and politics, may stir passions and tempt people to "climb soapboxes", Wikipedia is not the medium for this. Articles must be balanced to put entries, especially for current events, in a reasonable perspective, and represent a neutral point of view. Furthermore, Wikipedia authors should strive to write articles that will not quickly become obsolete. However, Wikipedia's sister project Wikinews allows commentaries on its articles.

Also, Wikipedia does not allow original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions.

Lastly, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Daask (talk) 14:07, 7 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Connie Ford Johnson, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Connie Ford Johnson! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 7 September 2018 (UTC)