ConradWalterSmith
Welcome!
editHello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
- Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
- Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
- Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
- No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
- If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
- Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
- Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.
The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Doug Weller talk 10:18, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
December 2017
editHello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Chin people has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Chin people was changed by ConradWalterSmith (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.913949 on 2017-12-29T02:43:17+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:43, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
Chin/Zomi
editPlease don't do that again. If you have a dispute, take it to the talk page with sources meeting WP:RS. I realise that there is a dispute over nomenclature but we don't take sides over this. Doug Weller talk 10:19, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
You're mistaken
editThere is not some simple dispute over nomenclature. Zomi is a subgroup of Chin itself. A lot of this info is factually incorrect and you are doing a huge disservice by propagating this false info. You have no idea what you're doing. Go to any Chin communities in the US and show them this page. This is outrageous and insulting to Chin people. You can't write your suppositions and guesses as facts and pat yourself on the back. By spreading these false information, you're dividing an entire ethnic group. This is essentially like saying one European ethnic group constitutes the entirety of Europe. ConradWalterSmith (talk) 21:29, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
I've started a discussion about your behavior
editThere is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Doug Weller talk 09:23, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Edit warring at Chin people
editHello, ConradWalterSmith. Firstly: please note that uncivil comments like this are entirely unacceptable on Wikipedia. Secondly: Persistent removal of sourced text from articles, such as you have done at Chin people, is considered disruptive and violates Wikipedia policy on edit warring. Any further behavior like this will result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Discussion and consensus are foundational principles of Wikipedia. Your initial edits were reverted because you failed to provide any reason for the removal of current text that is sourced to reliable independent sources. If you have a dispute about that information, than please use the talk page to discuss your reasons, and establish those reasons through reliable independent sources. When there is a dispute, consensus of opinion must be reached before any further edits are made. (Read WP:BRD — of which, you are now in the “discuss” phase -- for more information.) Please follow these Wikipedia guidelines and maintain civil discourse. Thank you. — CactusWriter (talk) 20:10, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Dear CactusWriter
editGo fuck yourself as well. You wiki editors can get off your genteel cyber high horses since you suck ass at sharing knowledge and only spread false info while shooting down corrections. This is why Wikipedia is a joke and less people are becoming editors. ConradWalterSmith (talk) 07:23, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Blocked
edit{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.