ConvenientlyIgnoredRealities

December 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Puerto Rico, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dekisugi (talk) 16:42, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Dear Dekisugi, I appreciate that you communicate with me. For clarity purposes, could you please specify what your referring to, what particular edit? I am attempting to present a sourced-version of the facts rather than sitting passively as non-sourced or incorrectly sourced statements are profered on that article.

For example, why did you edit a particular paragraph that offered specific and essential information, which is sourced as well as very pertinent to the section at hand, by a substitute paragraph that offered a non-sourced reference to something along the lines of "one of the major parties contested" ...? Don't you think that the sourced summary is more accurate or useful to readers interested in a succint exposition of essential information on this topic? I honestly would like to know your feedback on this matter. Merry Christmas, Happy Hollidays and Happy New Year!

ConvenientlyIgnoredRealities (talk) 16:46, 24 December 2007 (UTC)