Welcome

edit

Hello Cookshat, and welcome to Wikipedia. I hope that you have enjoyed contributing and want to stick around. Here are some tips to help you get started:

If you need any more information, plenty of help is available - check out Wikipedia:Questions; ask your question here and attract help with the code {{helpme}}; or leave me a message on my talk page explaining your problem and I will help as best as I can. Again, welcome! strdst_grl (call me Stardust) 15:44, 21 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Lamont

edit

Please see WP:UNDUE - "Undue weight applies to more than just viewpoints. An article should not give undue weight to any aspects of the subject but should strive to treat each aspect with a weight appropriate to its significance to the subject. For example, discussion of isolated events, criticisms, or news reports about a subject may be verifiable and neutral, but still be disproportionate to their overall significance to the article topic. This is a concern especially in relation to recent events that may be in the news. Note that undue weight can be given in several ways, including, but not limited to, depth of detail, quantity of text, prominence of placement, and juxtaposition of statements."

There is no way that four paragraphs of text about an event that barely qualifies as news is suitable for a biography that is already extremely heavily slanted toward Tourism WA related matters, and only ever "controversial" items that get added. Camw (talk) 23:51, 19 September 2010 (UTC)Reply


Thank you for the advice. I will try to better follow the policy you have provided above.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Cookshat (talkcontribs)

No problem, thanks for taking it on board - I know there are an awful lot of guidelines to deal with when writing here. I look forward to working with you on improving the article, including both bad and good items where appropriate. Camw (talk) 01:36, 20 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the advice. Yes its not easy trying to present the facts as one would in normal news style editorial, when there are a whole range of diferent and complex guidelines at play. I have just posted a clean up to the Oprah story and would appreciate your review of this. Thank you. Cookshat

March 2017

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Jemma Green, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. It is disruptive to remove edits that are more accurate.CaroleHenson (talk) 01:56, 22 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi Carol, Thanks for the advice on the Jemma Green occupation clarification. I guess the term "Independent" is the point of contention as there is no Independence in a faction or voting block. Thank you. Cookshat (talk) 05:16, 22 March 2017 (UTC)Reply