Draft RfC
editA. User engages in personal attacks
edit- User:Violetriga tells Irate to be less arrogant on talk for WP:ITN [1], see also [2].
- Develops into a spat culminating in this state. Violetriga moves to her talk page per two user's suggestion, but Irate restores argument two times. Refering to the removal as vandalism, Irate says the removal is typical for a dishonest user who has lost the "rational debate" [3][4].
- User:Violetriga reported 3RR violation on the WP:AN so that neutral party could block parties [5].
- Irate responded "... I suggest you should be blocked until you learn not to be so rude, stupid and dishonest...." [6], claims that user is dodging questions [7], says that "the Vile Trige" thinks that not answering questions is not incivil[8]. When violetriga responds "Irate: I have no idea what 'questions' you're talking about." [9]. Indicating possible harassment Irate replies "I have no idea what the first phrase of your statment is about unless it a smoke screen to distract from the ensuing dishonesty." [10].
- Violetriga makes a final plea to cut out the personal attacks [11]. Response: "Truely pathetic" [12]
- User:Vacuum
- Irate added "This user is a dishonest editor who does not care about votes or democracy. Noone should take anything they do at face value" to user's page three times [13][14][15]. When Vacuum asked why he was a vandal, Irate ignored the question (see failures to resolve). Irate has to date never edited Vacuum's talk page.
- User:Jfdwolff's request Re: Jayjg VfD [16]
- "Yeah, he had a little poke somewhere else..." [17] Other users elaborate, but Irate makes several more insults against Jayjg until the topic culminates in this state which has since been removed [18].
- Insults toward User:Jayjg: "ignorant", "arrogant", [19] "snide little gob shite", "manipulative", "without any value", "spoilt brat", [20] "dishonest", [21] "dishonest and manipulative", [22] "unpleasant toerag", [23] "self-righteous prig", [24]
- Also started VfD for User:Jayjg's user page [25].
B. Incivility
edit- Re:Clitoris [26], toward an possible sock puppet reverting him: [27], Against Anthony in particular: [28], [29]
- Created Template:POVW (a disclaimer for "offensive warning message") and placed it on Penis [30]
C. User violates the Three revert rule
editReverts Clitoris and astounding 11 times in 18 hours, 18 minutes while ignoring talk page remarks (see above). Was blocked at 17:06, 2 Dec 2004, but unblocked 23:29 becasue User:Anthony DiPierro was not blocked for his four reverts, and at least one admin (Theresa knott) didn't feel this was treating all parties equally.
- First revert, 20:37, 1 Dec 2004 [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41]. Last revert 13:55, 2 Dec 2004
D. Ignores attempts to resolve
edit- Deletes talk page requests from Violetriga [42], User:Vacuum [43], [44] ("remove Junk"),
- User:Cool Hand Luke's talk request about not insulting users on Clitoris [45]
- User:Anthony DiPierro's request to heed the 3RR on Clitoris [48]
- Deleted as "vandalism" [49]. Anthony restored [50], User:Sannse agreed [51], but Anthony's comments again deleted with assertion that edits Anthony's edits are simple vandalism [52].