User talk:Coovmich/sandbox

While it is a good idea to add some more sources for this page, I think what the page really needs is more content. The article itself is little more than a paragraph or two. The talk page has a number of issues that would help the article, such as exploring the idea of computer literacy in different countries, or clarifying a bit more the difference between computer literacy and digital literacy, i.e. why do we need a page for both? Several talk page comments also point out some style issues that you could work on fixing (it is perfectly OK to modify what others have done on the article so far). As it is, you really do not have a draft of what you are changing in the article as much as some research you plan to add. I am more interested in your writing here than your research. Clafjaco (talk) 17:34, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Peer Reveiw

Hey, so yes, add as may sources as possible, but Claflin is right about the need for content. I suggest getting some more done asap, because there is a lot missing from the article. See if you can find some studies and experiments that you can use to show how it is studied in the real world. Foxx Molinari (talk) 02:33, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Both reviews have said pretty much what I would comment on. The article definitely needs a lot more content and variety about the subject. I would like to see some work on the direction of the article. Claflin brought up some excellent points about weeding through the talk page and getting some ideas that would help boost the article. Kirbkati (talk) 00:08, 12 June 2017 (UTC)