User talk:Coren/Archives/2010/July

e-mail

I sent you a wikimail. Please give me a ping if you received it. Skäpperöd (talk) 08:28, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

You should have received a response. — Coren ^(talk) 13:37, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Odd false positive

Thought you might be interested in this one, since I'm not seeing almost any overlap between the article and the source. VernoWhitney (talk) 19:58, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

That's... odd. Maybe the bot got confused by the garish colors and horrid prose?  :-) I know my reaction was "Gah!" I'll look into it, though, and try to figure out what went wrong. — Coren ^(talk) 23:18, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Cayuga Chamber Orchestra

I went through the steps to "donate" the text that I have the copyright to for the Cayuga Chamber Orchestra page just created earlier today. I'm new to the process of this but hopefully I completed all the steps necessary to get the original posting back up. Thanks. Susanithaca (talk) 04:31, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

What's going on?

First you tell everyone off for bickering about tags, now you're engaging in it yourself, and clearly against consensus? Is this the sort of thing arbitrators are allowed to do that ordinary mortals are not?--Kotniski (talk) 18:35, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Look, I don't know what game you are playing here, but I have no intention to play. That you disagree with the existing policy is perfectly allowable, but does not and cannot change the fact that it is policy. I think it's too vague and overbroad, and risks whipping moral panic into a nice, mob froth. I also think that the page is not needed at all, but egregious lies in the media apparently makes such restatement of actual practice desirable. But no disagreement will make this suddenly not policy. Placing that tag on top of the page will not stop those blocks, but may mislead people into thinking that there is some question about whether advocacy or self-identification is strictly forbidden or not. There isn't. It's forbidden. — Coren ^(talk) 18:43, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

So it seems we do actually have the same opinion about this (except that I don't think it's allowable for individual editors to suddenly declare a page to be policy without discussion, regardless of whether what's (currently) written on the page is a true statement of practice - we could create thousands of pages of true statements of practice, but the community doesn't want thousands of policies). I hope you will support my latest suggestion at the talk page.--Kotniski (talk) 05:59, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

message to me

There was a request to split the section from one page to a new article and that was conducted as so.

--Thehelpinghand (talk) 06:10, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Alimaan Charitable Trust

Hello, The article was created to propagate the activities of Alimaan Charitable trust which is striving for the welfare of the community. The texts taken from website are solely used as a source of Information to better support the neutrality and authenticity of this article and not as a source of sentences. Wherever required necessary modification has been done. Hence I dropped you a message and removed the tag. Regards Humaliwalay (talk) 05:59, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

CorenSearchBot error

Hi. I received a false positive copyvio on 25613 Bubenicek. Reverted and noted on talk page. --Merovingian (T, C, L) 23:40, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Again

I received a false positive copyvio on 26267 Nickmorgan. Reverted and noted on talk page. --Merovingian (T, C, L) 07:54, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Copyright Notice

I actually own the copyright to the text placed in the wikipedia page, I have just posted the same biographical information on RedBubble as my profile:

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Meilena Hauslendale, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.redbubble.com/people/sharpieartist. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

My wikipedia page is the following:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meilena_Hauslendale

Please let me know if you have any further questions that I can verify for you. My main source of citation on my own site is located here :

http://sharpieartist.com/biography.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by Meilena (talk • contribs) 15:24, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

New SPI system

[1] T. Canens (talk) 04:57, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Wait, isn't that why you get the big salaries?  :-P — Coren ^(talk) 04:58, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Bandhish 1981 film

may i know what does your message means?

In india there is a hindustani music related thing -- called as bandhish.so an article by same name appears in wikipedia.

what i have contributed is artcle abot the film bandish released in 1981. Both articles have same name but are different things. One is a film and another is some musical composition. Please do disambiguition by yourself and help in keeping the contribution alive. plus you check in Internet movie databse and even in articles related to the stars of the film and even from Youtube. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shrik88music (talk • contribs) 19:01, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

I've got this. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:56, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

SPI GoRight

I have a question, hopefully one that doesn't violate BEANS or confidentiality. I'm not familiar with the open proxies stuff: you said Goright only has an open proxy in asia left in history, so technically Inconclusive, but no counterindications. Go by behavior as needed. - are there any conclusions to be drawn from an editor editing through open proxies? I thought they tended to get blocked (the proxies) whenever identified William M. Connolley (talk) 07:28, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

It's not clear that they are currently using proxies to edit, but what's left of GoRight's edits in the logs comes through some random Chinese host since blocked for being a proxy (and thus is not very useful for comparison). But the UA are consistent, so while it's not possible to say it's a match, it certainly can be the same person. — Coren ^(talk) 13:55, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. I subsequently found Wikipedia:Open proxies (which I could have found first :-) which also helps William M. Connolley (talk) 14:21, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Coren bot and splitting articles

When Coren bot spots similarities between Foo and Foo (bar), there is a good chance that either splitting or disambiguation is occurring. Might be worth skipping these cases? Rich Farmbrough, 11:45, 5 July 2010 (UTC).

(talk page stalker) Pages are very often split incorrectly (without attribution) so skipping this would not be a good idea. Theleftorium ^(talk) 11:52, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

What he said.  :-) — Coren ^(talk) 13:51, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

At least catch those cases where what Coren bot thought was stolen from somewhere else outside Wikipedia was stolen by somewhere-else from Wikipedia in the first place. --Vaughan Pratt (talk) 06:45, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Proof split

I just split the dab page for "proof" into two, dealing with truth and quality respectively. Your bot picked up on bits that others had copied out of Wikipedia into other websites and complained that Wikipedia was copying those. Interesting circularity there! --Vaughan Pratt (talk) 05:48, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

hello :)

just testing the Wikipedia =) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Msarimz89 (talk • contribs) 08:20, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Your comment regarding user Radeksz

You said here "With the understanding that any relapse is likely to be poorly received." Unfortunately it appears that Radeksz is proxying. Please look here for more information and diffs. Where would be the appropriate place for me to report this? Varsovian (talk) 12:25, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

I did not proxy for anyone. I noticed Varsovian's edit myself and checked the sources - in fact I go into quite some detail in examining them on the talk page. I caught Varsovian misrepresenting sources and trying to use citations to support a claim completely at odds with what the sources actually say. I notified Future Perfect at Sunrise about this since he dealt with a similar case recently. Varsovian is now attacking me and making this crap about proxying up to try and save his own skin. Trying to cover up a wrong with another wrong is really ... I dunno, you pick a word, cuz I don't want to be incivil.radek (talk) 12:47, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

I might add that Varsovian's behavior on this article has been found problematic by several others users in the past (and before anyone brings it up, none of them have been on EEML), he has received about half a dozen warnings concerning his edits there from administrators at AE (each time he promised to lay off only to come back a few days later and resume once "the heat died down", or stalled by claiming not to be able to respond except by phone) and the matter has been brought up over at WP:Poland IIRC - the article has been on my watchlist for quite awhile. The article has also been the starring attraction over at WP:AE several times now, each time in regard to Varsovian's behavior there - another reason I kept an eye on it.radek (talk) 12:56, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Without wondering how Radeksz stumbled upon my edits, or pointing out that he's being economical with the truth by claiming that user Jacurek was not on EEML ([2]) or that in another explanation he claimed to have seen something about this article at another user's talk page ([3]), I'll just point out that his claims regarding me misrepresenting sources is dealt with in detail at the article's discussion page [4]. Varsovian (talk) 13:05, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

I was not referring to Jacurek but rather to Chumchum7, Kotniski, Robert Warren, Future Perfect at Sunrise, Loosmark, Stifle and probably Sandstein (I can't remember exactly with regard to Sandstein). And more recently Nick Cooper [5].radek (talk) 13:08, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

The matter seems to have been handled at Enforcement, and I don't think there is anything for me to contribute at this point? — Coren ^(talk) 14:24, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Sorry but I'm not sure I understand what you mean. Has something happened today at Enforcement with regard to Radeksz? It is only Radeksz that I am asking about here. Varsovian (talk) 14:31, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

I'm guessing Coren is referring to your frequent visits to that page, or perhaps just the last one.radek (talk) 14:35, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Weird copyvio notice for List of Medium episodes (season 2)

This message is weird, for one the url linked doesn't work (I get a server error). The page should be about Jay Leno, although all the content on the article page is about Medium. Bot error or is golfingold.com just a weird website? The content itself was moved from List of Medium episodes where it has been like that for a long time. A self google search with some of the summaries came up with nothing. _Xeworlebi ^(talk) 16:15, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) The match is still in Yahoo's cache, and it is a very weird website including some wiki-mirroring, so that probably explains some of the false positive. VernoWhitney (talk) 16:27, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

False positive

The CSB tagged a copyright violation at Clement Finch, but an examination of the article which it claimed to be the source of the copied text is not at all similar to the tagged article. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:45, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

False Positive too

Hi there, your bot flagged Club Natación y Gimnasia for copyvio. It's an error. The two pages are not even in the same language (!). Thx. Saebhiar Adishatz 05:16, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi there, your bot flagged I-Testament for copyvio. It's an error. the page is about a rock group and not the reggae album I-Testament which is reggae and dancehall artist Capleton. Da Hot Spot 000 (talk) 05:25, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

hi, about citrus, no copyright problems, i'll just start with the original website-content and will fit it into wikipedia-standards, ok? thx :-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aby74 (talk • contribs) 09:25, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Mardi Lunn - false positive

The bot copyright notice for Mardi Lunn is way off base - but surprisingly fast. Tewapack (talk) 05:53, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Copyright infringement?

Hi Coren,

I am so impressed, first of all, by how well everything works in here. Hope yuo can help me out with this:

I have received a notice that the text I have placed upon the FormPipe Software page could be copyright infringement. I just would like to tell you that it is not. I work with the company, and we would like to have a short notice here about what we do and who we are, as you can see on the page. That the text is similar to that on our own web is completely ok, this is how it is supposed to be.

I am not the copyright owner of the text, but I am merely stating that there is no infringement in this matter as far as we see it.

Thanks in advance for your help and quick reply,

Anne Thorstensen —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anne Thorstensen (talk • contribs) 08:31, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

National School Sailing Association - another false positive!

Hello Coren - you appear to have flagged a page I wrote about the National School Sailing Association after is was flagged as copyrighted material - IT IS NOT COPYRIGHTED - as I wrote the source text. However your automated bot searched the web, found the original text and then flagged it. Within seconds another user choose to delete it.

How can any new users be given the chance to author anything if their work is deleted with being given the chance to defend it?? Clearly your bot is flawed when other user assume it's output is correct without verification. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Noodles955 (talk • contribs) 22:01, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

About Sri Ragam v/s Shree (raga)

Just to let you know, I'm splitting the article Shree (raga) in to two because it deals with two unrelated music subject belonging to separate systems of music in India. Spundun (talk) 20:01, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Pls check

The bot generated a wrong notice in the article Nguyễn Trường Tô. Pls check. Thanks.Relentless Justice (talk) 16:08, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Confirmed false positive. VernoWhitney (talk) 14:32, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

false positive on new journal

Apeiron:_A_Journal_for_Ancient_Philosophy_and_Science improperly flagged for copyright violation. I understand that no bot is perfect but I would appreciate it if you would delete this notice. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Reportica (talk • contribs) 09:57, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Arb case

Please comment here: Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Race_and_intelligence/Workshop#1RR and on the motion. Thanks. — Rlevse • Talk • 20:09, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

CorenSearchBot error

Hi. I received a false positive copyvio on 58896 Schlosser. Reverted and noted on talk page. --Merovingian (T, C, L) 05:26, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Bot Error

Check Occitan (local currency). Thanks in advance. Regards, --— J. F. B. ^{(me´n parlar)} 06:24, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Simon Francis (artist) and Simon Francis Duplication

Sorry about this, I've created the new page Simon Francis (artist), and turned Simon Francis, into a disambiguation page. I didn't know you could move or rename articles, I'll have to read up on this.
Thanks, benBRFC ^talk 11:02, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Albion Nimbus: A False Positive

I've checked the site the bot's comparing it to and it's clearly a false positive, so I'm removing the tag.

Yours Stephen Allcroft (talk) 14:58, 14 July 2010 (UTC) Stephen Allcroft

Journal_of_Statistics_Education Removed copyright material

I've removed the copyright material, accordingly and will remove the csb-pageincludes tag from this page. Thanks, Iwaterpolo (talk) 17:00, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

KunhardtMcGee Productions

Hi I work for KunhardtMcGee Productions. I am updating our wikipedia site using a little explanation from our website, but I keep getting messages from Coren saying it is not allowed. Please advice me on how to keep it the way it is! Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Georgekun17 (talk • contribs) 19:36, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Article false copyright infringement

I created an article called Duane J. Roth. It was flagged as violating copyright from being a close copy to http://www.connect.org/00%20old%20site/about/duaneroth.htm

I work at CONNECT and sit next to the person who put that article up on CONNECT.org. Please let me know if there are any questions I can answer or anything I can do to help this process Wwalkerconnect (talk) 21:27, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Lingtsang Gyalpo

I created an article called Lingtsang Gyalpo. It was flagged as violating copyright from being a close copy to http://www.rigpawiki.org/index.php?title=Lingtsang_Gyalpo However, I did rewrite the article, based on rigpawiki. Of course, there are quite long names in this article that might have prompt the bot to recognise the modified article a similar to rigpawiki, but, please compare, I did rewrite. --Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 21:58, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Presbyterian University

Hello i received an error on website page copy. we have since removed the offending text. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Director-ict (talk • contribs) 20:44, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Paika rebellion

Both the info are from a common source, ie the Gazetteer of Orissa a free source, hence not a Copyright issue.hence i am deleting the warning. thankyou

Tej smiles (talk) 22:41, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Answer re Invention (industry)

• I am the author of this text, which was placed by me on WP article "Industrial invention"

now redirected. The external link you refer to copied my article from WP. I did not copy from anyone else.

• I am also the author of this new article, and I copied text from my previous WP article "Industrial invention"

• The reason for all this: This is a better title, and better applicable to the Disambiguation page which I will edit now.

• Your response is so very fast - amazing.

--Zutam (talk) 03:22, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

copyright vio on disambig

Hi there, I don't know if this is a malfunctioning bot or what it is. But it just tagged Degrassi (season 2), a short disambiguation page I just created. I don't even know what it figured was copied, there is no mention of the original series' on the next gen website. 117Avenue (talk) 04:39, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Article Entry 'C-VAT'

Hi there,

I am the administrator for this tool that has a user base of 250,000. For this reason, we are trying to create a wiki page on the founder, information about the tool. I have created an entry but was sent a msg saying that the original entry will be deleted because of a similar web entry. We provided the information to this 'similar' web entry.

How do we get around it? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by C-VATUserGroup (talk • contribs) 10:29, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Please read the guide to donating your own copyrighted material to Wikipedia. Note that, in addition to copyright requirements, the article must still comply with notability guidelines, advertising prohibition and avoid conflicts of interest. — Coren ^(talk) 12:07, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Nematoceras sulcatum

Hi Coren - I have removed your tag from Nematoceras sulcatum as it appeared to refer only to the title of a legal act and not to any substantive amount of text. Maias (talk) 14:36, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Primary sources

Hi - I saw your draft proposed decision in the Race & Intelligence case. On the question of primary sources, I agree completely with what you're getting at, but I guess my only concern is that language like "the use of primary sources to cite content is generally not allowable" has the potential to cause unforeseen problems. Primary sources can be used responsibly and can contribute substantially to a really great article, although (as you note, and as has been the case in the R&I arena) they can also be woefully misused.

We kicked this problem around while drafting WP:MEDRS. The recurring problem there was that a clear consensus would exist - say, that abortion does not cause breast cancer. But then editors with an axe to grind would carefully select, cherry-pick, and arrange individual studies to editorially undermine that consensus - e.g. "The medical establishment has concluded that abortion does not cause breast cancer. However, a 2004 study reported that it does." The language we came up with is here (first paragraph) - we went with phrasing about "respecting secondary sources" - that is, when primary sources are used, they should be used in the context of their interpretation by expert bodies, rather than chosen and juxtaposed at an editor's whim. Anyhow, not sure how relevant it is to the R&I case, but just thought I'd give you the link since we also tried to tackle this issue. MastCell ^Talk 17:22, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Race_and_intelligence/Proposed_decision#Self-published_sources

Your proposed decision Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Race_and_intelligence/Proposed_decision#Self-published_sources says "Self-published sources, including books, newsletters, personal websites, open wikis, and blogs, are largely not acceptable. While they may occasionally be used as source of information on themselves, they do not constitute reliable sources as required by our policies on verifiability and original research."

That's not quite what WP:SPS (policy) says. It says "Self-published material may in some circumstances be acceptable when produced by an established expert on the topic of the article whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable third-party publications." If you perhaps want to say that the specific SPSs used in the articles in question weren't published by established experts, you may want to say that explicitly. Or if you want to say that WP:BLPSPS (also policy) which forbids even expert self-published material applies, you may want to say that explicitly. Otherwise I suspect parties will point out how your proposed ruling contradicts policy. --GRuban (talk) 17:34, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

This is what I meant by generally; there are a number of subtleties that can apply, but I don't believe this case is best served by the marginal cases but by a strict(er) adherence to the general case. — Coren ^(talk) 18:56, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

FC Kontu Itä-Helsinki

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of FC Kontu Itä-Helsinki, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.playerhistory.com/Default.aspx?page=club_details&clubID=1071. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:16, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

(User:Finnish Gas 10:26, 20 July 2010 (UTC))

FC Kontu Itä-Helsinki

The Bot made a mistake on this one as I have not referred to [6]. I have therefore removed the tag. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Finnish Gas (talk • contribs) 10:30, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Irez Productions

{{OTRS pending}} on Irez Productions.

Permission was given to me by the owner. Email sent from owner, Bryan Ramirez. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Morganbarnhart (talk • contribs) 13:51, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Shopi (dialect)

Bot is giving copy warning on webpage that is a clone of Wikipedia.

Warning removed. ProcEnforce (talk) 19:47, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Whoa, something's wrong

See tag (in history, I removed it) on GO-Urban. Maury Markowitz (talk) 11:48, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Silliman Memorial Lectures

I've put a note on the discussion page. In this case Yale was repeating a standard paragraph that has appeared in most of the lectures they've published since around 1906 and therefore before copyright. Chris55 (talk) 07:01, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

I have now been informed by User:Theleftorium that I should have put a source-attribution template on the page in question. This was not obvious from the message the searchbot left nor from the Copyright page that it directed me to. I've done it now, but could I suggest that you add something to the message left by the bot to help in cases such as this. Chris55 (talk) 09:30, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Prof. Zwi Segal page

Hi, I wrote new page for Prof. Zwi Segal, I have the same text in several pages over the web, also in his partners company sites as his profile,

Please advice what I need to do

Thanks in advanced

Shahar Matorin 972-54-5205555 shahar@mianou.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Smatorin (talk • contribs) 18:03, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Sauber Petronas Engineering

I just started the page on Sauber Petronas Engineering by copying some information from Sauber, but my intention was to add to the page fairly quickly. Shouldn't it be OK to work like that? John Anderson (talk) 08:40, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

CorenBot too sensitive to Stub class articles

Looking over this talkpage and Stražbenica (Banovići) which was tagged on a user talkpage, it appears that your Bot is off. ----moreno oso (talk) 15:13, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

I don't see that the bot did anything wrong there. Can you describe the problem, please? Hipocrite (talk) 15:17, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

This is my second visit to this page and if you can't see it, you're missing the forest from the trees. Any Stub class article can almost directly be considered a copyvio if the rule is rigidly enforced or looked at. Seeing other editors visit this page describing similar tagging should be enough of a description. ----moreno oso (talk) 15:20, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Er, did you see what the bot tagged? The article was a copy-paste of another stub - it was actually the same article. The author did exactly what the search-bot suggested - redirected the article to to the other stub. Hipocrite (talk) 15:22, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

About copyright Sonia Escolano

Hello. I am the owner of http://www.mynahasgone.com and all its content therefore I think that this article in wikipedia is not a copyright violation. However, I've written a new article without infringing material, in the following temporary subpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Magina3/Sonia_Escolano/Temp Please, I wish this issue can be cleaning soon. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Magina3 (talk • contribs) 17:33, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Louisville Swim Association

This page is not plaigerizing louisvilleswim.org, since the section the bot is referring to is simply a listing of events, which cannot be written any other way. The source of information is http://www.eteamz.com/louisvilleswim Ayoazorwich17 (talk) 22:24, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

I just added two new proposals to the Arbcom case on Race and Intelligence workshop

I know that voting has begun, but having observed the behavior on the article and on ANI and elsewhere since the workshop more or less ended, I believe that proposing some more significant remedies is necessary. These people are not going to work together in the future.

Thanks. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 23:16, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Take Ivy

The [Take Ivy] page was labeled as copyright infringement and I think the bot was mistaken as the date I see is 2nd of July. Please advise. Thank you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wainblatrobert (talk • contribs) 13:27, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Waitby

False alarm by the bot [7] Sf5xeplus (talk) 01:32, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Maria Astrologes - false positive

Another false positive on Maria Astrologes. Tewapack (talk) 04:54, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

University of York Drama Society

Hey! Your bot noted the faults on my new page and although I've sorted them I didn't want to get rid of the warning without asking first. Thanks koocl —Preceding unsigned comment added by Koocl (talk • contribs) 16:08, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Akácfa utca and János Füzi

Dear Coren! The above mentioned pages are my own translations. The original source is the Hungarian Wikipedia's pages. --Ksanyi (talk) 17:01, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Oversight request

Hello Coren, just a quick note to you, to point out what appears to me to be a potentially libellous allegation of criminal activity contained in this edit summary.[8] cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 19:05, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Niagara Parks Butterfly Conservatory

Here's a new article I created. Please help improve it. It's also up for DYK for 24 July. — Rlevse • Talk • 21:26, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Western Region Campus

Well, I guess any information placed on an institute's website/brochure is a public information. Thats why the content from the site mentioned has been referenced. Though it might be much similar, as told by you, I guess its updated and corrected in many aspects. Please verify again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Acpmasquerade (talk • contribs) 14:11, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) While information may be released to the public via website/brochure, that does not automatically mean it is available to be redistributed and modified by others, which is what is required in order for content to be used on Wikipedia. VernoWhitney (talk) 14:22, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Parfois Fashion Acessories - message received

Good afternoon,

I inserted a new article called: Parfois (fashion accessories) An automatic message came expressing that part of the text was similar to an article found in the web: http://www.worldfranchiseassociates.com/franchise-news-article.php?nid=488 Please consider that the sources used came directly from the company being described and that the above mentioned article is based in the same sources. In adittion, the article I´ve written has updated ad accurate adittional information. Please consider this explanation in order to ignore the automatic message received. Many thanks for your good work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fcamarate (talk • contribs) 17:18, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

William Robert Whatton

false positive. at what point is the number of false positives indicative of a vandalbot? do the ends justify the means? Accotink2 talk 20:16, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

A Happy Healthy You

Help please

I received the message listed below from you and was wondering if my emails have been received. I work for Androvett followed the appropriate instructions for verification. Why has my page been deleted? What can I do to prevent this page from being deleted if it is republished?

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of A Happy Healthy You, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.androvett.com/news/releases/2010/06/18/mary-jo-mccurley-co-authors-book-on-womens-lifestyle-issues. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Almwiki10 (talk • contribs) 21:05, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

2nd Brigade Special Troops Battalion

Just letting you know your bot picked up on a page that I need to have a talk with for copying the material found on my Division website. I'm adding in the pages to my subordinate units (since some of them weren't there) and I'm pulling unit information from my site. Apparently, this other site did the same but without our knowledge. And to give you a heads up, it'll probably find quite a few more of these for me too.

1st Cav. Div. Webmaster Rvnknight (talk) 15:59, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

If you're including the text word-for-word, it would be appreciated if you include {{US Army}} in the References section to make it clear that it was originally written elsewhere. This would also keep CorenSearchBot from incorrectly tagging the articles as possible copyright violations. VernoWhitney (talk) 16:13, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Which is also why I have the page linked at the bottom under the external links. Rvnknight (talk) 16:25, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

I understand, but the bot doesn't read text, it only recognizes the template. It will get sorted out either way though, so no worries. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:46, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

FYI: False positive

At Mike Sands (football player). It was deleted as an attack page but it bore very little resemblance to the page it was tagged as copyvio of. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:15, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

New York Stars (WBL)

The copyright warning regarding the New York Stars (WBL) is not even about the right sport. The alleged copyrighted material is about the New York Stars of the World Football League, not the New York Stars of the Women's Professional Basketball League. Other than sharing the same team name, they have absolutely nothing in common. Alansohn (talk) 02:03, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

About page Zhu Benli, Prince of Han

Thats article is first written by me in wikipedia, then the other sites copy it from wikipedia before admin delete this page. Please be wise. Thanks.Kungkang (talk) 09:13, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

The site is called "Wikiwak" and it is indeed clearly identified as a Wikipedia mirror. If you have a blacklist or whatever for the bot it should probably be added to it. Beeblebrox (talk) 09:19, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi!

See your bot's last edition in my Talk Page. Completely wrong! Regards. --Againme (talk) 16:56, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Bhakti Vidya Purna Swami

Hello, I wrote the first article on this featured on wikipedia under a different account name (ACRF WIKI). This page was deleted because I did not provide enough references. I have used the same text from the article I first wrote and learnt from my mistakes and found enough sources and references to publish the article again. I have a new account (mlot2612) and wish to post this page again properly. (Mlot2612 (talk) 06:44, 30 July 2010 (UTC))

FYI: you suck

I craZturtle am here to tell you that I did not include copyrighted information in my article: "All the biggest loser contestants" I am telling you I did not go to that website AT ALL. All of the information in my article is ORIGINAL. So I don't think it's fair that my article was deleted on such short notice. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CraZturtle (talk • contribs) 15:15, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

CorenBot false positive

If possible, let CorenBot know that anything based on the stem of http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/... will be in the public domain, as all such material reflects the content of federal statutes (or the official notes by the Advisory Committee on Rules, a government organ whose writings are also public domain).

I say this in response to the tagging of third party complaint.

Thanks, Andrew Gradman ^talk/_WP:Hornbook 20:35, 31 July 2010 (UTC)